ye u cud be right bout akon/curtis

sean_paul is overated! lmao, he does shots that i dont even see, im sorry m8 but i have to dissagree with that big time, he is maybe the best player on here, along with ste & curtis, so how you can say is beyond belief (i respect your opinion, but thats mine )

Edited at 22:10 Thu 20/09/07 (BST)

who are you top 5 of orig?

I wouldnt say sean_paul is overated either!!! just look at his stats, not much better is there? And lets be honest, does any other player go and knock in three centuries in a row against the_crusade. I think not...

Not just three century's but three 107's, witch i think will never get achieved again.. although iv had 2 in a row but 3 is just a great achievement well done Lyle mate

Three 107s in a row. Thats crazy........

I bow to sean_paul's incredible talent.

But sorry Sean_Paul, I have to post this

Arcade Snooker Ranked - sean_paul (0) 0-13 (3) cuchulain (by default, sean_paul left the game)
RANKINGS: cuchulain 925.3 (+7.08), sean_paul 904.4 (-7.66)

Edited at 16:45 Fri 21/09/07 (BST)

lmao, he wont be pleased

Edited at 17:06 Fri 21/09/07 (BST)

no i respect his record and the amount of centuries but centuries is just about getting on the black after youre break and whether or not youre prepared to risk the game on pink or black instead of bulk colours on ocassions. I have played him quite a few times and have beaten him alot more than hes beaten me. having more centuries and max's does not make you a better player. after all a 50-60 break will win a game!

Yeah but how many times have we played? And how bad was I playing?

Edited at 18:43 Fri 21/09/07 (BST)

yeah we can all use the 'im playing bad' card but end of the day moments of absolute brilliance dont make you a great player its about consistency and winning games.

Ye well you dont know how bad I actually was playin. and I know i certainly wouldnt of lost to u..

Edited at 19:14 Fri 21/09/07 (BST)

Having a lot of centuries and high breaks shows consistency... sean_paul is a very very good player. The best of the best loose some times...

no it doesnt really though does it... having 70 centuries in say 2000 games means you can play really good sometimes...

ofcourse the best players can lose sometimes. this is arcade snooker after all luckypot. Anyone can win that is the whole point! all im saying the really good players will lose less and will generally have a higher rank due to less losses

lol break king you will never win this discussion, lyle is one of the best that has ever played on this site. he is not over rated, i can say that from personal experience! he will always be 2nd best though lol

What ya mean after steven, then me and ste_efc_ joined 2nd... 3rd Oh yeah and break, talking about the rank, if rank makes such a good player, if you look at mine now, you will know i was playing bad

Edited at 11:47 Sat 22/09/07 (BST)