free ball rule
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:19 Wed 23 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
im bringing this up again
right i no many people would like to see this being implented (including me) and i am just wondering how hard could it be to implent?
also if this was implented i have 1 problem...
wont this mess up the high break leaderboards???
thoughts?
Damien
right i no many people would like to see this being implented (including me) and i am just wondering how hard could it be to implent?
also if this was implented i have 1 problem...
wont this mess up the high break leaderboards???
thoughts?
Damien
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:46 Wed 23 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
pffft he wants a 155 now
Almost impossible to code i'd say, not only would it be difficult to code wether or not you can see both sides of the next ball, also it would be nion imposible to code a colour counting as a red, overall it will be extremely complicated i imagine
Be happy with your 147!
Almost impossible to code i'd say, not only would it be difficult to code wether or not you can see both sides of the next ball, also it would be nion imposible to code a colour counting as a red, overall it will be extremely complicated i imagine
Be happy with your 147!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
11:59 Thu 24 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
LMAO don't you think a 147 is good anough mate
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:17 Sun 3 Feb 08 (GMT) [Link]
thought i would bring this up again as i think free ball is important as im sick of seeing 107 appear lol
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:11 Sun 3 Feb 08 (GMT) [Link]
Thats IMO still the main problem
2good said:
pffft he wants a 155 now
Almost impossible to code i'd say, not only would it be difficult to code wether or not you can see both sides of the next ball, also it would be nion imposible to code a colour counting as a red, overall it will be extremely complicated i imagine
Be happy with your 147!
Almost impossible to code i'd say, not only would it be difficult to code wether or not you can see both sides of the next ball, also it would be nion imposible to code a colour counting as a red, overall it will be extremely complicated i imagine
Be happy with your 147!
Thats IMO still the main problem
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
05:59 Mon 4 Feb 08 (GMT) [Link]
Very difficult for this to work because sumtimes when i play for a tight pot i jus catch the ball i wasnt goin for and jus skim it. U see u would sumtimes think u have a free ball when u dont cos if u aim far away from the ball u r playing for u can skim it.... (sorry hard point for me to explain)
damee said:
im bringing this up again
right i no many people would like to see this being implented (including me) and i am just wondering how hard could it be to implent?
also if this was implented i have 1 problem...
wont this mess up the high break leaderboards???
thoughts?
Damien
right i no many people would like to see this being implented (including me) and i am just wondering how hard could it be to implent?
also if this was implented i have 1 problem...
wont this mess up the high break leaderboards???
thoughts?
Damien
Very difficult for this to work because sumtimes when i play for a tight pot i jus catch the ball i wasnt goin for and jus skim it. U see u would sumtimes think u have a free ball when u dont cos if u aim far away from the ball u r playing for u can skim it.... (sorry hard point for me to explain)
11:32 Fri 8 Feb 08 (GMT) [Link]
mate i think the free ball rule is going to be in our new updates
potter147 said:
bring on the free ball rule!!!!!!
mate i think the free ball rule is going to be in our new updates
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
free ball rule
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.