Quarter-finals first to 2?
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
09:52 Mon 18 Feb 08 (GMT) [Link]
It gets really annoying when you come so far in tournaments to lose to flukes or people breaking and clearing. So I was wondering, the "rounds" are first to 1 and the semi final and final is first to 2. Quarter finals aren't a "round" so how come their not first to 2?
Your thoughts?
Edited at 15:56 Mon 18/02/08 (GMT)
Your thoughts?
Edited at 15:56 Mon 18/02/08 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
10:33 Mon 18 Feb 08 (GMT) [Link]
nah its fine as it is mate,
and isn't it first to 2 in the marathon's anyway? because wouldn't that make it more like the marathon?
and isn't it first to 2 in the marathon's anyway? because wouldn't that make it more like the marathon?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
12:14 Mon 18 Feb 08 (GMT) [Link]
No not really no, I think making them to two frames at the quarter's would be better, As like you say i have lost on flukes on a few occasions and it can get annoying, But then again it could make the tournament drag a little bit.
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
Quarter-finals first to 2?
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.