(Part One)

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mk7htWPF874&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mk7htWPF874&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

(Part Two)

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yAS4TIYF68A&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yAS4TIYF68A&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

need a few hours, i always thought something was fishy, this evidence convinces me there was, sure you'll agree that something was definately fishy about 9/11 . This is really well made and put together, tell me what you think

Mark

Edited at 23:59 Thu 19/06/08 (BST)

Nice thread!

Jesus iv just stopped watching them after a nour i couldn't watch it all lol...

As you said Mark it is well put together, as for the overall video i think its weird how it just fell, they are saying the temperature of the fire was as high as 1000 degrease and that is a lot. People said it was a bomb but i cant see that... what do you think Mark?

Edited at 00:27 Fri 20/06/08 (BST)

my views are as follows...

the south tower had a fire at the bottom shortly after the plane hit... how?

how did bush see the 1st plane hitting live when there wasn't any live images? the 1st videos was seen hours later?

how did all the evidence (passports etc) miraculously appear scattered intact all the around the crash sites?

our very own BBC said that WTC 7 had collapsed even though it was still visible behind the reporters shoulder?

how can a massive plane hit the floor and not one bit of fuselage or engine was found?

these are the questions i would like to know, i could go on all day but these are the one's i find most interesting

i'm sure you'll agree

First things first, it sure makes it seem that there was some kind of device either in the towers or the plane that went off after the collision.

Theres too many people who heard or saw a second explosion for that not to be correct.

Second, how can the investigators rubbish the fact that there was molten metal over 2000 degrees when there were thermal images showing same....wierd....

forgot about the molten steel point... very very interesting

Yeah i've seen stuff like this before.

Its all politics in my humble opinion.

There is definetly some questions that need some explaing. think its all a cover up by the CIA and FBI.

Its kinda like the death of Princess Diana. Theres too many things that dont match up.

BTW sorry for the terrible spelling very bad hangover.