I have played the new mini-game and think it is brill but i think there should be killer tournaments to get the game played by more funkysnooker players.

Thoughts.....
sam

apart from this already being covered ...

good idea

lol don't like it... the game lenghts are exceedingly long as it is...

yes i would agree, there would be no time limit on the games so it would clash with the other tournaments

on pool, tournaments clash all the time.. i reckon they would be a good addition.

maybe we should do a trial run with a tournament then see how much of a response it gets then can go from there

Would be the next step I guess.

Id suggest..............

Keep each round game with 4 players.....that means that its a nice divisable number.....and that 3 people get knocked out on each game thus making the tourny complete faster. If time was still an issue then the extra life for the black ball could be taken away just for tourny games

Heres an example. In 32 player tournament the following structure (if only two people in the final was to be a problem then some alternate structure to compensate)

32 Player Tourny

Round 1
PLAYER1-PLAYER2-PLAYER3-PLAYER4
PLAYER5-PLAYER6-PLAYER7-PLAYER8
PLAYER9-PLAYER10-PLAYER11-PLAYER12
PLAYER13-PLAYER14-PLAYER15-PLAYER16
PLAYER17-PLAYER18-PLAYER19-PLAYER20
PLAYER21-PLAYER22-PLAYER23-PLAYER24
PLAYER25-PLAYER26-PLAYER27-PLAYER28
PLAYER29-PLAYER30-PLAYER31-PLAYER32

Round 2

PLAYER1-PLAYER5-PLAYER9-PLAYER3
PLAYER17-PLAYER21-PLAYER25-PLAYER29

Final
PLAYER1-PLAYER17

or they can take away the black and add extra red

What help/difference would that make? All it would do is make it so people couldn't get an extra life, which is a good part of the game.

yeh but it would mean the game would go quicker (not that im in favour of killer torneys)

Ah yeah I see, didn't think of it in that sort of context for a tournament.

Shakes Tom

Wouldn't you need 3 players in the tournament final though as 3 is the minimum amount of players per game?

but it is the quickest (god im on the ball lol)