player is not responding
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:46 Sun 4 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
Surely players should get a number of lives for this per frame, i.e. they should not be able to do it more than 3 times a frame. It can lead to joint disqualification in a tournament, and is very annoying!
16:49 Sun 4 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
They don't choose to do it they can't control the connection.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:49 Sun 4 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
It would be annoying if it were the other way around too.
Its nobodies fault at the end of the day.
Its nobodies fault at the end of the day.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:51 Sun 4 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
ye have to agree with 2 comments above
its uncontrollable
it happens to me sometimes
it cant be help
if it leads to a joints disqualification in a tourny then i guess thats just bad luck
its uncontrollable
it happens to me sometimes
it cant be help
if it leads to a joints disqualification in a tourny then i guess thats just bad luck
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:09 Sun 4 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
What? I can't believe this has gone down badly, yes its no-ones fault, but that doesnt mean people should be DQ'd from tournaments, and have to sit down for 45 mins while their opponent stops and starts responding every 25 secs for the whole frame
17:29 Sun 4 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
I'm with pig here tbh I think having three not responding, should result in auto-concede.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
10:26 Mon 5 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
I think you lot have seen this thread as if he is complaining about people not responding. I'm with mike. The three lives thing is what his thread was about. I think its a good idea.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
10:31 Mon 5 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
It can be very annoying at times (mike ) but it isn't their fault if the connection is bad. However, if this were to be introduced, then I think it should be tournaments only, as it would be unfair if people lost rank due to it.
Good idea.
Good idea.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:37 Mon 5 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
Are there any mods going to add to the consensus here? I have to say earlier today i was on the other side of the argument and it still didn't change my opinion, it was unfair on my opponent as he sat there twiddling his thumbs while my internet messed around through a break
14:41 Mon 5 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
I wouldn't agree with it personally... the time it takes for you to get logged out was shortend not long ago, to 90 seconds I believe.
People's connections can be uncontrolable, and it is not only frustrating for the opponent, but for the player not responding also.
The way I see it.... It's 'just one of those things'.
People's connections can be uncontrolable, and it is not only frustrating for the opponent, but for the player not responding also.
The way I see it.... It's 'just one of those things'.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:44 Mon 5 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
Exactly as josh said, i dont see how it could be controlled either? I mean if your connection go's at the end of the day its gone. Nothing you could do about it really.
luckypot said:
The way I see it.... It's 'just one of those things'.
Exactly as josh said, i dont see how it could be controlled either? I mean if your connection go's at the end of the day its gone. Nothing you could do about it really.
17:24 Mon 5 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
I think it's a good idea, but:
- only in tournaments
- we shouldn't count the number of times a player isn't responding, but the total amount of time (like, 3 minutes in total)... it surely won't harm if a player isn't responding 10 times 3 seconds!
- only in tournaments
- we shouldn't count the number of times a player isn't responding, but the total amount of time (like, 3 minutes in total)... it surely won't harm if a player isn't responding 10 times 3 seconds!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:06 Mon 5 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
Very perceptive of you.
I just disagree, I think everybody understands what the point of the thread was, but the fact that it is nobodies fault means that nobody should be punished.
I can see the threads now:
"I have just lost a game when I didn't actually lose, all that happened was my connection went and I was suddenly DQ'd, how is that fair"
or words to that effect.
samj147 said:
The three lives thing is what his thread was about.
Very perceptive of you.
I just disagree, I think everybody understands what the point of the thread was, but the fact that it is nobodies fault means that nobody should be punished.
I can see the threads now:
"I have just lost a game when I didn't actually lose, all that happened was my connection went and I was suddenly DQ'd, how is that fair"
or words to that effect.
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
player is not responding
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.