900+ games in available rankings?
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
13:26 Mon 6 Apr 09 (BST) [Link]
I dont know about everyone else, but it's annoying when you want to play 900+ opponents and you get 800's (normal rank or newbie's) that join and dont leave. I was wandering if people would like it if you could have 900+ in the allowed rankings? Feedback please people. Cheers.
13:34 Mon 6 Apr 09 (BST) [Link]
But in all seriousness, isn't hard to move around the rooms if you do get a stubborn apponent in all fairness they have as muchright to be there as you. What difference does it make who you play? Is how i see it.
EDIT : Sorry forgot to put that the idea isn't a bad one, quite simple to do too im sure.
Edited at 18:37 Mon 6/04/09 (BST)
youngjeezy said:
If you dont like it, then dont play. Simple as.
But in all seriousness, isn't hard to move around the rooms if you do get a stubborn apponent in all fairness they have as muchright to be there as you. What difference does it make who you play? Is how i see it.
EDIT : Sorry forgot to put that the idea isn't a bad one, quite simple to do too im sure.
Edited at 18:37 Mon 6/04/09 (BST)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
13:38 Mon 6 Apr 09 (BST) [Link]
[QUOTE=virtuoso107][QUOTE=youngjeezy][B]If you dont like it, then dont play. Simple as.[/QUOTE][/B]
But in all seriousness, isn't hard to move around the rooms if you do get a stubborn apponent in all fairness they have as muchright to be there as you. What difference does it make who you play? Is how i see it.
[:)][/QUOTE]
What has that got to do with it mike? That was from a different thread. I know that alot of players get annoyed with this also. All i meant was you got allowed rank from all different ranges of rank, just not 900+.
But in all seriousness, isn't hard to move around the rooms if you do get a stubborn apponent in all fairness they have as muchright to be there as you. What difference does it make who you play? Is how i see it.
[:)][/QUOTE]
What has that got to do with it mike? That was from a different thread. I know that alot of players get annoyed with this also. All i meant was you got allowed rank from all different ranges of rank, just not 900+.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
13:39 Mon 6 Apr 09 (BST) [Link]
But in all seriousness, isn't hard to move around the rooms if you do get a stubborn apponent in all fairness they have as muchright to be there as you. What difference does it make who you play? Is how i see it.
EDIT : Sorry forgot to put that the idea isn't a bad one, quite simple to do too im sure.
Edited at 18:37 Mon 6/04/09 (BST)
its a great idea some people like to play 900s to improve there gameplay or gain points quicker therefore we should have this because we shouldnt have to change rooms all the time
virtuoso107 said:
youngjeezy said:
If you dont like it, then dont play. Simple as.
But in all seriousness, isn't hard to move around the rooms if you do get a stubborn apponent in all fairness they have as muchright to be there as you. What difference does it make who you play? Is how i see it.
EDIT : Sorry forgot to put that the idea isn't a bad one, quite simple to do too im sure.
Edited at 18:37 Mon 6/04/09 (BST)
its a great idea some people like to play 900s to improve there gameplay or gain points quicker therefore we should have this because we shouldnt have to change rooms all the time
13:49 Mon 6 Apr 09 (BST) [Link]
It's the same logic, someone complained you gave them that answer you complained... you get the jist, although like I said it is a good idea.
Your the player with the preferences so if you want a challenge what harm is there looking for it is all I'm saying.
abarth said:
we shouldnt have to change rooms all the time
Your the player with the preferences so if you want a challenge what harm is there looking for it is all I'm saying.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:18 Mon 6 Apr 09 (BST) [Link]
You have already told me Mike that you dont like me no more, so leave it. I aint arguing with you.
At the end of the day, the other thread was about "top players" cheating so to speak. This is about people constantly looking for the new game you create, just to be a pest and get you aggravated.
I can see a difference, can you???
virtuoso107 said:
It's the same logic, someone complained you gave them that answer you complained... you get the jist, although like I said it is a good idea.
You have already told me Mike that you dont like me no more, so leave it. I aint arguing with you.
At the end of the day, the other thread was about "top players" cheating so to speak. This is about people constantly looking for the new game you create, just to be a pest and get you aggravated.
I can see a difference, can you???
14:47 Mon 6 Apr 09 (BST) [Link]
This is a forum for opinionated posts is it not? My opinion is if you feel the need for a challenge where is the harm in finding it? There is no argument here so why try to imply there is? I just simply stated opinion.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:00 Mon 6 Apr 09 (BST) [Link]
Kiss and make up lads.
I think it is a good point personally - not that I would care as I will never be 900 again
I think it is a good point personally - not that I would care as I will never be 900 again
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:29 Mon 6 Apr 09 (BST) [Link]
there is no harm in having a 900 plus game option surely, there is one for every other option.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
19:27 Mon 6 Apr 09 (BST) [Link]
if the river is running red, hop aboard the boat mooring in the back... i agree make a 900+ it wont do any harm
05:57 Tue 7 Apr 09 (BST) [Link]
Well I think the problem is that with the new ranking system, there are very, very few people over 900.
Just have a look at the 900+ players count in the current standing:
arcade: 13
regular: 2
original: 7
killer: 1
carom: 0
So I'm doubtful about the relevancy of such a feature.
Just have a look at the 900+ players count in the current standing:
arcade: 13
regular: 2
original: 7
killer: 1
carom: 0
So I'm doubtful about the relevancy of such a feature.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
06:23 Tue 7 Apr 09 (BST) [Link]
Yeah right now it would be easier to look at the ranking's page and pm the people you want to play,in the future though were only gonna get more and more virtuoso's and this feature may become useful ( certainly won't hurt )
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
09:17 Tue 7 Apr 09 (BST) [Link]
Cheers for the feedback. I see your point blutch, i know since the new ranking change that there are very few virtuoso's but then aint it the same at the other end of the rankings? But there is still an available ranking for 500 to 700 i think it is. And Mike (rage) i agree. When more virts get introduced to all game type's, it would'nt hurt to have a 900+ for available rank.
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
900+ games in available rankings?
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.