ive been thinking about how clan matches are put in place and ive come up with a possible resolve,

i notice that wen we have clan games there is always a problem with a couple of matches not getting played,

would it not be a good idea to simply lay out
10 players vs 10 players with no specific fixtures, that way wen any clan member is online they can play any of the other players, this would also benefit those who are eager to play because technically they can pick there opponent.

however the one problem i can think of would be friends list being too full to add the whole team so maybe if we put the matches in sets of 3 and the remaining fixture as captain vs captain.

for example

hustlers v ????
leesil v captain
player 1 2 or 3 v player 1 2 or 3
player 4 5 or 6 v player 4 5 or 6
player 7 8 or 9 v player 7 8 or 9

this would give more chance of possible opponent being online

what do you all think

would any team trial this with the hustlers

yh good

good idea

nice idea lee but what if all of these decide to play and post results, who results will you go for, whos will be scrapped.

Clan games arent working enough as it is.

This in my opinion is waiting more games which dont need to be played.

nice idea but i cannot see this working to be fair.

well it would have to be the first result posted,

so if player 1 played player 3,

then player 2 + 3 can only play player 1 or 2


then when the match is played result updated
the remaining possible games posted

i was even thinkin when it comes down to 3 people each side remaining they could also play any of the other 3 remaining.

clan games are hard work to get completed so i just think this type of format would give it more chance.

steve mate you fancy putting this too the test,

hustlers vs goodfellas the ultimate challenge!

what if they post at same time mate, im only trying to narrow down the things why this would not work and this may cause arguments between players and in forums

no i agree completely m8, that would be a problem,

but that would mean one player playing twice and surely ( well ya never know ) people would know only to play one.

however to resolve this, wen the 2 players were due to start there game they could update before saying,

for example

going to play now deadend vs dano7

then they could quote this and enter result.

im thinking if steve accepts challenge then we can see how it goes as a trial.

good luck with that and hope you can prove me wrong, but i have a bad feeling about this

how will they post at the same time? one player cannot be in two matches at the same time.

I think its a good idea lee... hope it works mate.

Hey lee this seem's a good idea in theory.
Hope it works in practice

Post removed by forum moderator
Posted the above twice

thanks for your support,

me and steve will be getting this sorted asap,

dont wanna scrutinise the clan league at the moment tho,