I think they are great ideas and can easily be implemented into the game.

Personally I dont think its a major problem anyway. We all fluke shots on here. Its only a game at the end of the day. So what if every now and then we lose a game because somebody hit the wrong ball. Chances are we will fluke something ourselves and win a game because of it.

I am all for updates and bringing the game as close as possible to the real thing but not when it compromises on what is a slick fast-paced game. That is what makes it so popular, its easy to play and not over burdened by rules. We all have the option to play real snooker if we so desired

But its unfair to lose by that

A rash statement to say the least.

how often do they fluke a pot on a colour when they are snookered? Rarely! You are going to be back in play the majority of the time after they fluke so if you cant win from there then the 4-7 foul points you would have received isnt going to be much good to you anyway

computer programming is easy dave no work involved at all

I know LOL, it just bugs me when users make the assumption that a small change in perceived functionality is equivalent to a small effort in development effort and vice versa.

Yeah, I only ever did basic programming, but this seems a major deal in programming terms

Jesus getting all angry because of a forum post when it IS easy to implement and takes little effort.

yeah, even though this is a good idea, it isn't likely it will be implemented due to the programming nick would have to do to make it happen.

no it isn't it takes a great deal of expert programming, buddytobud knows a little bit as he does his ranking calculator, seb (whocares) knows a little bit and there is also the expert programmers known as nick and janmb from pool. Not sure if spinner knows programming but with his knowledge of computers who knows

once you learn programming (i did basic at college and i even struggled a bit (ask buddytobud) and thats basic so think what advanced programming is like.

Edited at 12:56 Fri 31/12/10 (GMT)

LOL ... that is almost as bad an assumption (but not quite)

try my best

i know it won't happen anytime soon (if ever) because of the expert programming needed and nick is busy these days either traveling or doing other updates which were all thankful for.