Double disqualification

Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.

stephenh2012
stephenh2012
Posts: 369
22:34 Fri 6 Jul 12 (BST)  [Link]  
I played someone in the micro arcade tournament final the other day. I was ahead that much that they needed snookers, but, as they usually do, they didnt try the snookers but got disconnected purposely. There was about 80 seconds left, so we ended up both disqualified. In my eyes it doesnt make sense that both players get disqualified altough one is marginally ahead. In a micro or speed tournaments theres only little time and there are a lot of double dq's. I think the player who is ahead should win when there is no time left, certainly when their opponent needs snookers.

Couldnt this change in the game? Thoughts?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
17:27 Wed 11 Jul 12 (BST)  [Link]  
This has been mentioned various times.

I agree its not fair when someone is ahead thus opponent needings snookers, but you get people like this all the time.

The server it programmed to DQ players when the timer is up, regardless of the points or snooker requirments, its harsh but thats FS.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
19:37 Wed 11 Jul 12 (BST)  [Link]  
I know it's frustrating Stephen.... shame the clock don't stop at the same time someone stops responding.... at least the time can continue when they do.... and it dont matter how many times it happens, you'll get to the end, even if the result is still DQ
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
11:37 Thu 12 Jul 12 (BST)  [Link]  
I know it's frustrating Stephen.... shame the clock don't stop at the same time someone stops responding.... at least the time can continue when they do.... and it dont matter how many times it happens, you'll get to the end, even if the result is still DQ
This would be nice..
Unable to post
Reason:You must log in before you can post

Double disqualification

Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.