Ok i have just noticed this and wondered if its right and if so why.



Now i will pick on bowler2013 for the example.

This is a Micro arcade tournament, so why does it not show the wins for each player for a micro tournament?

bowler2013 has won 56 Micro Tournaments in arcade.

However it is showing 7 which is his amount of tournaments in full arcade tournament.

The 2 are different tournaments so why would it not show the amount of the particular tournament they are in, rather than showing the amount of tournaments they have won in a different type of tournament?

btw do remember i am a girl and this may sound stupid and if it does i am sorry.

as micros are for the weak muhahahaha

y i have won two and played in on match lol

Yeah, it's right (or wrong!), it's showing those figures because it's an arcade format tournament, even though micro and main tournament wins are counted separately - so you could ask why not show the micro wins etc.

Always been like that, can't imagine it'll change

Micros are easily won however they are not for the weak because in a micro you get 8 players max an about 6/8 in each micros are normally players who are in the high700s so i disagree with you there

But yes sarah i agree with you iv always thought that but it doesnt really make much difference all it is showing how much you won a player with one win can win a tourney

Micro wins aren't credited and I think this is the right way yes, as it would distort the tournament win rankings (if anyone cares about them )

it wasnt a fact it was a joke