could awards be given each week?
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:06 Fri 26 Jan 07 (GMT) [Link]
as in person who has won the most games that week...most rank points won that week...most helpful person that week...employee awards
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:55 Fri 26 Jan 07 (GMT) [Link]
you could get an award, most pathetic idea of the week hahaha, only joking sounds decent but who would judge it
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
19:24 Fri 26 Jan 07 (GMT) [Link]
Well, i like the sound of most wins of the week award.
But, bit daft since judging would simply be based on favouritism in my view.
But, bit daft since judging would simply be based on favouritism in my view.
05:21 Sat 27 Jan 07 (GMT) [Link]
Most wins of the week wouldnt be fair to a lot of people as they arent on as often but have probably only lost a few compared to someone like me who is always online and winning half and half!! Maybe win % would be ok!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:04 Sat 27 Jan 07 (GMT) [Link]
yeah good idea sam but it would be based on facts and deatils from the admin as they will know how many wins etc etc etc people would have
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:20 Sat 27 Jan 07 (GMT) [Link]
I don't like the most wins idea. Way too unreliable.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
08:00 Sat 27 Jan 07 (GMT) [Link]
yeah true but ya see what i mean though? maybe recognising the people that have done well that week etc etc etc
14:38 Sat 27 Jan 07 (GMT) [Link]
If it was win % then someone could come on once in the week, win, then not play another game so they're guaranteed the prize!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:47 Sat 27 Jan 07 (GMT) [Link]
perhaps a minimum no. of games would have to be played before you are eligible. Not sure what the point of it would be though
15:41 Sat 27 Jan 07 (GMT) [Link]
Maybe it could be monthly awards so it wouldn't be too often. Then it could be stored on the 'Profile'>'Events'>'Awards'(An extra part added)
And yeah, a minimum number of games to be played would make it better. But I also think it should be games won, not %.
And yeah, a minimum number of games to be played would make it better. But I also think it should be games won, not %.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:47 Sat 27 Jan 07 (GMT) [Link]
bu then they could just constantly play on funkysnooker and could have say 1,000 wins to 2,000 losses as an example, and that wouldn't deserve an award
15:55 Sat 27 Jan 07 (GMT) [Link]
To get a monthly award wont be that big a thing, no-one is going to play 1000's of games to win a few words saying "Won Januarys most wins awards with 1275 wins".
And to be honest, anyone to play that many times in a month deserves an award!
And to be honest, anyone to play that many times in a month deserves an award!
09:45 Sun 28 Jan 07 (GMT) [Link]
i think it is a crackin idea i think ya shud have most losses and all 4 the bad players *cough me cough* lol and best newbie
11:11 Sun 28 Jan 07 (GMT) [Link]
How can best newbie be judged though? As you are only in the newbie status for 50 games. Unless it was the highest rank when leave the newbie status.
But then people maybe would keep reseting to get as high as they can after 50 games.
But then people maybe would keep reseting to get as high as they can after 50 games.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
12:03 Sun 28 Jan 07 (GMT) [Link]
yea highest break of the week is good... dont like the best newbie award as 'newbies' are rarely newbies. maybe sommin else like best avwerage break( supposing there was again a limit to how many breaks have to be made)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:10 Sun 28 Jan 07 (GMT) [Link]
all ideas are great and nick will put under consideration (hopefully)
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
could awards be given each week?
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.