Winning streaks - revisited
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
Pages:
1
2 14:52 Sun 9 Mar 08 (GMT) [Link]
I know this has already brought up, but I'm proposing a slightly different approach of it.
Basically, we could have a table containing people's winning streaks. This table would NOT be emptied every night.
However, people pointed out that it would lead people to play lower ranked players so they have easily a big winning streak. Here comes the new idea!
We shouldn't count the winning streak in matches, but in ranking points won. So the values contained in this table would be "the amount of points won since the last points loss". It would be a good indicator of who is in a great form, and would be evenly fair for lower and higher ranked players.
OK there's the edge modification, but the highly ranked players already have loads of lists to be on the top of, haven't they?
Also note this would mean friendlies are kept out of this statistic.
Basically, we could have a table containing people's winning streaks. This table would NOT be emptied every night.
However, people pointed out that it would lead people to play lower ranked players so they have easily a big winning streak. Here comes the new idea!
We shouldn't count the winning streak in matches, but in ranking points won. So the values contained in this table would be "the amount of points won since the last points loss". It would be a good indicator of who is in a great form, and would be evenly fair for lower and higher ranked players.
OK there's the edge modification, but the highly ranked players already have loads of lists to be on the top of, haven't they?
Also note this would mean friendlies are kept out of this statistic.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:23 Sun 9 Mar 08 (GMT) [Link]
fantastic idea fella, i am 100% with it and i agree with all that you have said
09:22 Mon 10 Mar 08 (GMT) [Link]
nice idea. wouldnt the same people be on it all the time though?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
09:25 Mon 10 Mar 08 (GMT) [Link]
No because the best players will be in the 900's and wont get as many points from games.
Nice idea mate.
Nice idea mate.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
11:10 Tue 11 Mar 08 (GMT) [Link]
Yeah not a bad idea matey.. hope to see it come to power
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
11:31 Tue 11 Mar 08 (GMT) [Link]
Nice idea The only downside i can see is people resetting and getting on the list that way by going from Newbie to Virtuoso.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
13:13 Wed 12 Mar 08 (GMT) [Link]
uve made a great idea beter m8 and i think this is great idea as the best players would hardly ever be on it
1 slight glich tho..............some peeps might be smart and drop they're rank on perpose and then get loads in a row to get the top spot
how would we solve this problem
still an amazing idea
1 slight glich tho..............some peeps might be smart and drop they're rank on perpose and then get loads in a row to get the top spot
how would we solve this problem
still an amazing idea
14:53 Wed 12 Mar 08 (GMT) [Link]
I think it wouldn't be a problem, as these stats would be dynamic. Imagine a player gets 100 points in a row, and then what? He'd be on the top until he loses a game. So either he doesn't play anymore just to stay on the top, either he keeps playing, and eventually he'll lose a game.
I think this stat would not cause such problems like someone resetting just to be on the top of it, because it's dynamic. It's just not worth resetting to be on the top for 2 days.
If we want to be sure, it could also work so that a player would drop from the table if (s)he doesn't play for a certain amount of time (2 weeks maybe). It still makes sense as it's supposed to show the players who are currently in a great form.
Edited at 20:56 Wed 12/03/08 (GMT)
I think this stat would not cause such problems like someone resetting just to be on the top of it, because it's dynamic. It's just not worth resetting to be on the top for 2 days.
If we want to be sure, it could also work so that a player would drop from the table if (s)he doesn't play for a certain amount of time (2 weeks maybe). It still makes sense as it's supposed to show the players who are currently in a great form.
Edited at 20:56 Wed 12/03/08 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:01 Wed 12 Mar 08 (GMT) [Link]
OH ok now i get it so its not a best winning streak but its a current winning streak so when you lose you go back to zero or even does it say EG.-3.07 if you lose a game or 2 in a row
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
10:51 Thu 13 Mar 08 (GMT) [Link]
couldnt u have 2 tables
1 table for most points gained 2day
2nd table for most points gained in 1 day ever
1 table for most points gained 2day
2nd table for most points gained in 1 day ever
10:53 Thu 13 Mar 08 (GMT) [Link]
Sounds simple enough to me gets my vote.
lord_snooker said:
couldnt u have 2 tables
1 table for most points gained 2day
2nd table for most points gained in 1 day ever
1 table for most points gained 2day
2nd table for most points gained in 1 day ever
Sounds simple enough to me gets my vote.
15:42 Thu 13 Mar 08 (GMT) [Link]
That's different from the basic idea, but also interesting. Personally I don't really like this idea because you need to play a lot in one day to get on the top. Therefore it doesn't show exactly people's skill, but also how much they can play in a day.
lord_snooker said:
couldnt u have 2 tables
1 table for most points gained 2day
2nd table for most points gained in 1 day ever
1 table for most points gained 2day
2nd table for most points gained in 1 day ever
That's different from the basic idea, but also interesting. Personally I don't really like this idea because you need to play a lot in one day to get on the top. Therefore it doesn't show exactly people's skill, but also how much they can play in a day.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
08:33 Fri 14 Mar 08 (GMT) [Link]
yh but wouldnt any type of leaderboard ur suggesting amount to hu plays the most in 1 day
the more u play in 1 day the points you gain
the more u play in 1 day the points you gain
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
10:13 Fri 14 Mar 08 (GMT) [Link]
it wouldnt coz if you lost you lose your streak so if you play 100 in a day and lose after everywin ya gona have +8 as biggest streak or summit like tht
10:31 Fri 14 Mar 08 (GMT) [Link]
And in my suggestion, your streak continues until your next loss, if you don't lose in 5 days, then 5 days ranking points would be summed up.
(that's what I meant in my first post when I wrote: "This table would NOT be emptied every night.")
(that's what I meant in my first post when I wrote: "This table would NOT be emptied every night.")
Pages:
1
2Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
Winning streaks - revisited
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.