Its really anoying when you are beating someone by 50+ points and they cant win but they wont concede and its during the tournement with 1min to go and you both go out.
Can you sort this out nick!!!!!!!!!!!

Edited at 14:29 Mon 29/05/06 (BST)

It shud be the person who is winning when the time runs out who goes through

couldnt agree more quick shot....
a player as fast as yourself aswell m8.
needs sorting .
the other night was buy after buy through it ,more buys than games .

Thanks for agreeing kimmy, and i also i saw what phase said and i agree there maybe other problems with other ways like having the person with most points go through but i have got a good idea that could be if the person doesn't concede then they should get banned, even though some people may think this is too harsh punishment but if they know there guna get banned if they dont concede then they will concede and everybody will be happy.

and u get some sad pps when your wining tease you on the time limite and try to get u DQ

Its very frustrating when the other player is a long way behind but when is it acceptable to play on, for instance the only game i have won from needing snookers i needed 3 with blue, pink and black left, and got them but some ppl would of just said stop wasting my time you cant win

torneys are the worst some sore looser try and get u dq

Another one to be looked into i think. i Replied to something like this on a different thread i think

Yep, i'd say this was the second most popular querie in the forums (second from players leaving on a break)

Maybe in finals, player with the highest score wins? I'd also say take away the time limit but some players would take to advantage and stay until the opponent leaves.

Edited at 16:28 Fri 25/08/06 (BST)