On the review screen of scores, what are peoples views of having a maximums table. i.e. recorded as 1 point for everytime you make a maximum break.
Would make it more competative to get the most of them, rather than it just being recorded as 107 in the max breaks list.
The max break list is going to end up being the same for ages if people make 107's. Would it be better do have the highest break for a certain period, like, each week its refreshed, so you can see who has the highest break in a week?
Views/opinions?

i think the idea of a weekly highest break list is a great idea, because it will make it more competitive and also give people a chance to get on there who are never going to get on the highest break list. Or maybe a list of the highest breaks overall, not just peoples personal highest where they can only therefore have one break on there but a list that takes all breaks into account even though you may have made a higher break in the past i.e when i get a century it will never register on the current list because i hav made a 107.

Edited at 12:51 Tue 27/06/06 (BST)

Sounds good to me,a sort of "whose currently on form" list.

Yeah I'd like to see who is on form, and who has the highest break of the week :)

On a pool game i used to play it has a current win streak, like if you win 7 games in a row it will say "Winning Streak: +7" I think this is a good idea too.

I like the idea of win streak stats,it shows who is currently on form.You would have to have a time limit since last game as people might "sit on" the streak.

Yeh, but they'd have to play sometime, otherwise it would be boring to sit on a steak and not play
A winning steak thing does sound cool though

i fink its a gr8 idea coz it wil giv every 1 a chance 2 b on da board

Edited at 10:40 Sun 2/07/06 (BST)

the downside to this is it may encourage people to only play low ranked and bad players who anyone could beat to ensure a victory and try to get a good winning streak together.