Fan Clubs of tourny players!
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
13:32 Sat 9 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
You're.
Am? You mean I am, surely?
Sorry, Mr. 3000 posts, I'm obviously far too obsessed with this game, completely different to your fine self.
the_kop said:
Doubleee, but while am here Lee, there is no comparison, something popping up all of a sudden is completely different to constant talking. Stop trying to cause an argument with me, your not going to get one I'm afraid. Not worth my time.
You're.
Am? You mean I am, surely?
Sorry, Mr. 3000 posts, I'm obviously far too obsessed with this game, completely different to your fine self.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:02 Sun 10 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
Sorry, Mr. 3000 posts, I'm obviously far too obsessed with this game, completely different to your fine self.
Nail. On. The. Head.
alexus said:
the_kop said:
Doubleee, but while am here Lee, there is no comparison, something popping up all of a sudden is completely different to constant talking. Stop trying to cause an argument with me, your not going to get one I'm afraid. Not worth my time.
Sorry, Mr. 3000 posts, I'm obviously far too obsessed with this game, completely different to your fine self.
Nail. On. The. Head.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
09:47 Sun 10 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
I think you mean "you're". If you're going to try and be clever with other people's posts I would try and be a bit more careful with yours . Or maybe you don't know the difference between the two? (if I had the smilies there would be one here ;))
Edited at 15:50 Sun 10/01/10 (GMT)
the_kop said:
P.S, themselves, not themself.
the_kop said:
Doubleee, but while am here Lee, there is no comparison, something popping up all of a sudden is completely different to constant talking. Stop trying to cause an argument with me, your not going to get one I'm afraid. Not worth my time.
I think you mean "you're". If you're going to try and be clever with other people's posts I would try and be a bit more careful with yours . Or maybe you don't know the difference between the two? (if I had the smilies there would be one here ;))
Edited at 15:50 Sun 10/01/10 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
11:33 Sun 10 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
I pointed that out earlier. People making 'witty' remarks must, at all costs, use correct spelling and grammar. Otherwise your post turns into a joke.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
11:35 Sun 10 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
suggestion for new title on thread:
The Spelling and Grammar Appreciation Thread
The Spelling and Grammar Appreciation Thread
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:22 Sun 10 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
@the_kop, i don't think thats a fair thing to say. Just because people don't have lots of mates that watch there games in tournies doesn't mean they don't have any mates at all.
I do.
Well that's a bit of a ridiculous thing to say isn't it... I have many friends on Funkysnooker but i don't have them watching all of my tournament matches... I feel like you're just trying to start an argument...
the_kop said:
dumb_duck said:
@the_kop, i don't think thats a fair thing to say. Just because people don't have lots of mates that watch there games in tournies doesn't mean they don't have any mates at all.
I do.
Well that's a bit of a ridiculous thing to say isn't it... I have many friends on Funkysnooker but i don't have them watching all of my tournament matches... I feel like you're just trying to start an argument...
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:38 Mon 11 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
Almost single handedly making these threads interesting
Keep it coming people.
Keep it coming people.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:44 Mon 11 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
I think you mean "you're". If you're going to try and be clever with other people's posts I would try and be a bit more careful with yours . Or maybe you don't know the difference between the two ? (if I had the smilies there would be one here ;))
Edited at 15:50 Sun 10/01/10 (GMT)
I understand the difference, however, if you are going to get picky me old china... you're doesn't work in that circumstance (bit in bold). It was past tense, therefore you were instead of you are.
Also whilst I'm on the tedious subject, capital letter after a ? mark.
Luckily for me I have smilies so I can do this.
EDIT: Post had too many smileys
Edited by forum moderator nick, at 11:45 Sat 18/12/10 (GMT)
samivic said:
the_kop said:
P.S, themselves, not themself.
the_kop said:
Doubleee, but while am here Lee, there is no comparison, something popping up all of a sudden is completely different to constant talking. Stop trying to cause an argument with me, your not going to get one I'm afraid. Not worth my time.
I think you mean "you're". If you're going to try and be clever with other people's posts I would try and be a bit more careful with yours . Or maybe you don't know the difference between the two ? (if I had the smilies there would be one here ;))
Edited at 15:50 Sun 10/01/10 (GMT)
I understand the difference, however, if you are going to get picky me old china... you're doesn't work in that circumstance (bit in bold). It was past tense, therefore you were instead of you are.
Also whilst I'm on the tedious subject, capital letter after a ? mark.
Luckily for me I have smilies so I can do this.
EDIT: Post had too many smileys
Edited by forum moderator nick, at 11:45 Sat 18/12/10 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:49 Mon 11 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
@the_kop, i don't think thats a fair thing to say. Just because people don't have lots of mates that watch there games in tournies doesn't mean they don't have any mates at all.
I do.
Well that's a bit of a ridiculous thing to say isn't it... I have many friends on Funkysnooker but i don't have them watching all of my tournament matches... I feel like you're just trying to start an argument...
Of course it is ridiculous. But not as ridiculous as your (definitely not you're) uncanny ability to point out the obvious. What next? You gonna tell us you're not actually a duck?
dumb_duck said:
the_kop said:
dumb_duck said:
@the_kop, i don't think thats a fair thing to say. Just because people don't have lots of mates that watch there games in tournies doesn't mean they don't have any mates at all.
I do.
Well that's a bit of a ridiculous thing to say isn't it... I have many friends on Funkysnooker but i don't have them watching all of my tournament matches... I feel like you're just trying to start an argument...
Of course it is ridiculous. But not as ridiculous as your (definitely not you're) uncanny ability to point out the obvious. What next? You gonna tell us you're not actually a duck?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
21:07 Mon 11 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
I think you mean "you're". If you're going to try and be clever with other people's posts I would try and be a bit more careful with yours . Or maybe you don't know the difference between the two ? (if I had the smilies there would be one here ;))
Edited at 15:50 Sun 10/01/10 (GMT)
I understand the difference, however, if you are going to get picky me old china... you're doesn't work in that circumstance (bit in bold). It was past tense, therefore you were instead of you are.
Actually you're wrong.
It wasn't past tense.
You wrote: "your not going to get one". (Which is wrong)
It's meant to be: "you're not going to get one" (present tense)
Or: "you are not going to get one" (present tense)
There's no past tense going on there at all I'm afraid.
_______________________________________________________
you were = you were
you are = you're
your = the possessive form of the pronoun "you"
Edited at 05:57 Tue 12/01/10 (GMT)
the_kop said:
samivic said:
the_kop said:
P.S, themselves, not themself.
the_kop said:
Doubleee, but while am here Lee, there is no comparison, something popping up all of a sudden is completely different to constant talking. Stop trying to cause an argument with me, your not going to get one I'm afraid. Not worth my time.
I think you mean "you're". If you're going to try and be clever with other people's posts I would try and be a bit more careful with yours . Or maybe you don't know the difference between the two ? (if I had the smilies there would be one here ;))
Edited at 15:50 Sun 10/01/10 (GMT)
I understand the difference, however, if you are going to get picky me old china... you're doesn't work in that circumstance (bit in bold). It was past tense, therefore you were instead of you are.
Actually you're wrong.
It wasn't past tense.
You wrote: "your not going to get one". (Which is wrong)
It's meant to be: "you're not going to get one" (present tense)
Or: "you are not going to get one" (present tense)
There's no past tense going on there at all I'm afraid.
_______________________________________________________
you were = you were
you are = you're
your = the possessive form of the pronoun "you"
Even though this has nothing to do with the thread title.............
Edited at 05:57 Tue 12/01/10 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
21:19 Mon 11 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
double post
Edited at 03:43 Tue 12/01/10 (GMT)
Edited at 03:43 Tue 12/01/10 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
21:21 Mon 11 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
triple post
Edited at 03:43 Tue 12/01/10 (GMT)
Edited at 03:43 Tue 12/01/10 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
03:32 Tue 12 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
I think you mean "you're". If you're going to try and be clever with other people's posts I would try and be a bit more careful with yours . Or maybe you don't know the difference between the two? (if I had the smilies there would be one here ;))
Edited at 15:50 Sun 10/01/10 (GMT)
If we take the ' out you would get...
If you were going to try and be clever with other people's posts I would try and be a bit more careful with yours.
Edited at 09:41 Tue 12/01/10 (GMT)
samivic said:
the_kop said:
P.S, themselves, not themself.
the_kop said:
Doubleee, but while am here Lee, there is no comparison, something popping up all of a sudden is completely different to constant talking. Stop trying to cause an argument with me, your not going to get one I'm afraid. Not worth my time.
I think you mean "you're". If you're going to try and be clever with other people's posts I would try and be a bit more careful with yours . Or maybe you don't know the difference between the two? (if I had the smilies there would be one here ;))
Edited at 15:50 Sun 10/01/10 (GMT)
If we take the ' out you would get...
If you were going to try and be clever with other people's posts I would try and be a bit more careful with yours.
Edited at 09:41 Tue 12/01/10 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
03:52 Tue 12 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
Back to my original point... it is obvious that people get themselves into a nervous state during finals. (I used to do it but you soon get used to it/ take it for granted/see it as any other game the more you play in them. In the mean time, just put everyone on ignore, rather than ruining it for those who want to talk during finals, and players who don't care if they do or they don't.
If people just went into the finals with the idea in their heads that "nobody cares", then they wouldn't get into that nervous state.
Other than your "friends" on here, nobody really cares, you might get the odd well done here and there but that is mainly courtesy.
If people just went into the finals with the idea in their heads that "nobody cares", then they wouldn't get into that nervous state.
Other than your "friends" on here, nobody really cares, you might get the odd well done here and there but that is mainly courtesy.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
09:36 Tue 12 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
I think you mean "you're". If you're going to try and be clever with other people's posts I would try and be a bit more careful with yours . Or maybe you don't know the difference between the two? (if I had the smilies there would be one here ;))
Edited at 15:50 Sun 10/01/10 (GMT)
If we take the ' out you would get...
If you were going to try and be clever with other people's posts I would try and be a bit more careful with yours.
no.....
you'd get...................
If you are going to try and be clever with other people's posts I would try and be a bit more careful with yours.
the_kop said:
samivic said:
the_kop said:
P.S, themselves, not themself.
the_kop said:
Doubleee, but while am here Lee, there is no comparison, something popping up all of a sudden is completely different to constant talking. Stop trying to cause an argument with me, your not going to get one I'm afraid. Not worth my time.
I think you mean "you're". If you're going to try and be clever with other people's posts I would try and be a bit more careful with yours . Or maybe you don't know the difference between the two? (if I had the smilies there would be one here ;))
Edited at 15:50 Sun 10/01/10 (GMT)
If we take the ' out you would get...
If you were going to try and be clever with other people's posts I would try and be a bit more careful with yours.
no.....
you'd get...................
If you are going to try and be clever with other people's posts I would try and be a bit more careful with yours.
09:47 Tue 12 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
The Internet: A place where no one questions the websites for suicidal people, and those filled with sick jokes yet one wrong spelling can have you lynched..
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
10:01 Tue 12 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
It was because he was trying to be clever correcting someone when he had mistakes in his own post.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
10:02 Tue 12 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
No-one's been lynched and there has been no criticism of spelling, just grammar. I couldn't care less whether someone has poor grammar to be honest but it's the "being really clever about someone else's post but not having the ability to get your own right" that gets you rinsed.
Edited at 16:06 Tue 12/01/10 (GMT)
Edited at 16:06 Tue 12/01/10 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
10:05 Tue 12 Jan 10 (GMT) [Link]
I understand the difference, however, if you are going to get picky me old china... you're doesn't work in that circumstance (bit in bold). It was past tense, therefore you were instead of you are.]
Past tense? Really? You really were scraping the bottom of the barrel with that one.
Past tense my ar...
the_kop said:
I understand the difference, however, if you are going to get picky me old china... you're doesn't work in that circumstance (bit in bold). It was past tense, therefore you were instead of you are.]
Past tense? Really? You really were scraping the bottom of the barrel with that one.
Past tense my ar...
...........se
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
Fan Clubs of tourny players!
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.