So you make a sub... dont inform either player we play the game without knowing then you want me to play someone else? I have a sneaky feeling if the result was the other way round you would have overlooked it... but hey how do I know...

can't see how they could force a replay tbh

If the original players played game and weren't informed of the sub i can't see how the result won't stand?

If they had both been messaged informing of the sub then i could see why the sub would stand.

if im honest here i wouldve let the result stand since they played game (i know its after sub was made) but they got it played in the end.

I'm not sure if this is biast or not towards snooker but i think the game should stand really.

but at the end of the day its the league runners choice.

the thing is spursjay messaged me asking to be subbed, so i subbed him so don't start accusing me of being biased, HE asked to be subbed so i subbed him. It isn't my fault he didn't check the thread prior to playing his game.

If it bothers you that much you can have the result.

ahh if he asked to be subbed then fair enough.

but i don't get why spursjay played when he asked to be subbed :S

Well, he PM'd me last week asking to be subbed but i said i'll give him until week two and if he still hasn't played the game or messaged me saying otherwise i'll sub him, which is what i did.

Not fair on mich when he's not been told anything about the sub to expect him to play it again!

enough said about the matter please!. There was obviously some sort of mis-understanding with the two players concerned and me. I told spursjay he would be subbed by monday if the his situation hasn't changed, i recieved no message stating he could play his games so i went ahead with the sub.

and the conclusion is...

Mich Vs kodd still stands.

What a joke this is lol

call it what you want, i have discussed this with mich and he is happy to play kodd, if you don't like it you dont have to continue playing because i am getting annoyed at people moaning and groaning about the decisions i have made, but yet when i explain my self to the individuals they understand and agree with my decision, so maybe you should stop getting on you high horses.

Yea we all know it would've been different had mich lost

think what you want to think, but the event will be dropped if this continues, i didn't create it for you all to be childish fools.. but i guess i should of expected that from pool.

childish fool? you're the one who insisted the sub should stand, you really don't make any sense, if you're so driven to win then so be it but I'm not wasting my time talking to you anymore

mich has no problem in playing again thats what ronni has said . you just love causing trouble . you do very same thing over on the pool thread trying cause agruments .

at the end of the day its only a game

Right I posted last night when I was a bit angered at the decision and to be honest if I hadn't of spoken to eemad my views would still be the same but he insisted that Ronni is not biased so I believe him.

We have come to the understanding that myself spurs and Ronni were all a bit misunderstood on the matter and maybe messages should have been sent to the players, also I apologised for my outburst as it was not the correct way to go about things and I made incorrect assumptions, however I am happy to play kodd at the end of the day it is just a game not world war 3.

Thanks

stop posting on the thread with a reply if you don't want to talk to me. Why is it just you and kevross who kick up a storm?, i spoke to mich and i explained my reasons why i said the result won't stand, and i then gave mich the option as to whether he would like to take the three points, or to play again, he said he doesn't mind playing again so thats how it will stay, he made the chouce not me!.

I just don't see why it is such a huge problem?, seriously it's 3 points. mich is good enough to get the three points still anyway and he knows that, he also had the chance to keep the 3 points he already had so i just don't see how this is all my fault.

I don't want anything else to be posted about the subject please, i just want to continue with the event whilst there is still some interest!. If you are all unhappy with mich's choice, then consult him and if he wants to change his mind i'll be open to giving him the three points ok.

thank you very much mich , no hard feelings mate, i looked at it from your point of view and i understood, hence why i PMd you and explained . but like i have just stated above, you can still change your mind if people feel that badly against the decision.