RESULT: Arcade Snooker Ranked - tommybsct (0) 17-79 (1) i_am_god
RANKINGS: i_am_god 920.0 (+0.0), tommybsct 674.5 (-0.5)

i dont get anything at all?

maybe you got 0.04 so it rounded down to 0.0?

getting nothing is right,playing someone so inferior shouldnt be rewarded with lots of points for a win.

far as i know, when tournapoints came out, normal rank got halved and you dont win much vs a 600 anyway.

Greatest be quiet.

Basically its what Moons said, if you get something like 1.56 it will round it of to 1.6.

So in this case you got something like 0.01 - 0.09 so it rounded it upto 0.0

Oh the irony...

It can happen this situation, just very rarely it doesn't. Unfortunate but nothing can be done otherwise.

as far as i know, normal ranked wasnt changed. Tournament rank is double the old rank which is different.

No, the normal rank is definitly different...
Even on original, dont get half the points you would usually get..

if it was doubled dec, in a tournament you would get 24 points on original instead of the 12 or 13 it is now.

to me tournies is like the old rank and normal ranked it is halved not entirely sure on this but i think its close.

Yeah it is, cause nick couldn't give players 24 points for a game of original, as it would happen too much in tournaments.
He had to halve the normal scores, but im not a fan of that in all honesty

oh the blindness....

Surely it's rounded down...

we talking ZERO points here ...not LOTS OF ... very clever...

For once more you convinced us, well done... Greatest Nothing
on the site.

Somebody ban him for goodness shake, or i'll find a way myself.

Edited at 18:21 Tue 07/12/10 (GMT)

Ban me for what? What a ridiculous thing to post.

Wtf are you on about? You been smoking something?

Weird how everybody seems to think they have more of a right to voicing an opinion than greatest does.

Anyway, I think something like what mooney suggested could be a good explanation. Although I really don't have a clue about the ranking system so I'm not sure.

beacuse 99% off the time he posts to be annoying lol

if u can't understand the way greatest put things, trying to annoy everybody with silly and irrelevant crap so as to change subject of the thread, then it's your problem jack_pot, not ours.

Im not answering again, i'll do what i promised i will. Until then tada.

His comment was on topic, therefore not irrelevant at all?

Indeed, ranking change for ordinary games was reduced to 60%, but that doesn't make much of a difference in this case (ok, it may *possibly* have been 0.1).

What you're mostly seeing is the increased newbie protection, see here:
http://www.funkysnooker.com/thread/7537/patch-newbie-changes-ranking-posting

If you hover over ranked games on tommybsct's profile you will see full information, that due to him being a newbie, changes are reduced to 12.1%.