thought it was rhetorical

isnt that the same thing as we have now, as both get to break off and try and clear?

lol not at all if i play you i could possibly break of clear up then leave but not in powersnooker
in powersnooker you get to respond

its the same as power snooker we have now.

all your asking is for power on arcade with less reds, i don't see the point really.

lmao whats the point having arcade when you have regular
there is no point . just the same but there is

the point is in my opinion and those that would choose to play it and the reason for any game we play FUN

1) There is every need to have 3 main snooker tables, due to the number of people that play them.

2) Power snooker is still well in it's early days and needs a lot more users playing it before we even contemplate another power snooker table on this site

3) It just simply doesn't work on the arcade table at all. Would be too much of a squeeze. And you would have to have 9 reds on the table as that is power snooker (and before anyone says "well arcade only has 10 reds so that's not realistic to snooker" well they are wrong, as there is a tournament with all the big names in with only 10 reds on the table, can't remember name of it but it shows on eurosport)

1) its not about the need for it its the want

2) ever thought the reason people dont play it on reg cos they would prefer to be on arcade or original size table

3) just because there isnt a game in the real world with less than nine reds doesnt mean it cant be done its just a GAME the balls and pokets are the same size to say it simply doesnt work is complete noncence

there is no reason a game cant be made if people are willing to play everytime i look at carom there is only a few games being played id be willing to bet there would be more people playing arcade powersnooker before long

Edited at 15:48 Wed 19/01/11 (GMT)

this would not work, the table is so easy to play on (arcade) and regular is inbetween arcade and original so in all fairness its fine as it is

people keep saying it will not work like its a fact is just silly what you mean is you dont want to play it
theres no difference in a player clearing up for a max in arcade then playing again so his apponent has a chance to do the same sound 2 easy to me if thats what you can do i cant get a max easy and lots of others cant either its only easy if your one of the best

Edited at 15:59 Wed 19/01/11 (GMT)

corrected things in bold

it just won't work on arcade.

that is exactly what it is

nonsense

regular table was nominated as the table for power snooker because people prefer original, while others prefer Arcade, so it was the fairest idea to put it on the reg table so people would not complain or moan about it

Wonder if this potato chap has been talking to greatest.....welcome another idiot to the forums

probably is greatest

Wrong.
Was put on regular because Original would be to hard, and arcade would be to easy.

It will never get changed onto arcade


http://www.funkysnooker.com/thread/7462/power-snooker-cue-the-revolution/1
^^ read that.

Edited at 16:18 Wed 19/01/11 (GMT)

i get that but its just silly then what that says to me is if it was on arcade more people would play if it was on original more would play instead its on a table cos people prefer the other tables lmao wow

to hard and to easy are not valid reasons for me that only works in the opponent sense if im equal to my opponent how is it to easy or to hard we both get the same crack at it
its to easy and to hard to win for some in arcade tornys but still people play in them

Edited at 16:20 Wed 19/01/11 (GMT)

theres just no need for the insults and from what iv read greatest is against power snooker im all for it on all formats so what does that even mean ?

Its more because you have no real evidence to prove its a good idea, yet you still post garbage.