sarahh 3-1 tiger_woods

ggs wp

3rd Clan League Individual Tournament

Play one frame of each game type! (Arc, Reg, Orig, Carom, Power)

First Round (playing down to 32). 40 Players

Fixtures:
Deadline: Friday, March 23rd

mvp vs obieeeee
virt_slayer vs kilimanjaro
sarahh 4 vs 1 thegame26
davey1985 0 vs 3 damee
whocares8x8 3 vs 0 r1p0m4n
wales__lad 3 vs 2 ededed
bluenose1872 vs _unforgiven_
_gh0st_ vs horse10000

Round 2 (playing down to 16).
Deadline: Sunday, April 1st

Fixtures:

adam_147 vs zina
doomslave 1 vs 4 slatty
new_devil 3 vs 2 i_am_force
hughsy89 vs mrmagic
stuartl2011 vs sn00kwizard
ajstyles007 vs ill_be_there
gollum vs ang_k
crazy_greg vs cphaynes
linfield1886 vs (mvp or obieeeee)
dgeneratio vs (virt_slayer or kilimanjaro)
sniper_147 0 vs 3 damee
tiger_woods 1 vs 3 sarahh
_nut_case_ 0 vs 3 whocares8x8
sean vs wales__lad
i_am_blessed vs (bluenose1872 or _unforgiven_)
i_am_beast vs (_gh0st_ or horse10000)

Please post results in the following thread:
http://www.funkysnooker.com/thread/8249/clan-league-individual-competition

virt_slayer..hardly about or playing ..have messaged him

its actually not up to him - its up to me - i claim the frame - simple! - going by your rules

Thanks

Snooks

I have explained the rules to you. Read back if you're interested.
http://www.funkysnooker.com/thread/8249/clan-league-individual-competition/30#600003

exactly

he left the game - it was intentional - dont know why - you would need to ask him

but no worries - i hereby forefeit the match due to league runners interfering in the game.

Thanks

Snooks

That's your choice. I have not interfered in the game- he has in fact conceded the frame to you so that you don't incite further trouble.

The rules are clear and have been applied in other clan games before. If the score is close and it is early in the frame, the frame is replayed (unless one side wants to concede). This is because we want games decided on the table, not by disconnection.

What you choose to do here is entirely your choice. The score currently is 2-1. You have until April 1st to play the remaining 2 frames.

no - he has tried to make me look like an idiot - as have you - for following the rules stipulated by yourself.

he won on the black in arc - had an ok break in reg - and with only 2 reds left in orig - with both over pockets - he decided to disconnect - knowing there was a good chance i would clear up what was a scrappy frame

then pleads his innocence and because very few points were scored - you assume there was a lot of points left to play for and that the frame was in its infancy

by assuming that - you then state the frame should be replayed - why??? - when there were a possibkle 43 points left on the table and 2 reds over the pocket should i give up a winning opportunity

then get ridiculed for doing it

Thanks

Snooks

LOL, poor Seb. Thankless job init..

it is when decisions are made based on assumptions rather than facts unfortunately

Snooks

How exactly have I ridiculed you???

A 4 point difference with 43 points left to play is close. I have never had any trouble from stuartl2011 in previous seasons, even when he was losing frames. The rules that you keep referring to stipulate that the league runners can interfere in case of unintentional disconnection.

You have accused him of effectively cheating to get the frame replayed, without addressing his statements about what happened. He has in fact conceded the frame since then- not the usual M.O. of someone cheating to replay a frame.....

I don't know why you've started all this again. It was dealt with days ago when stuart conceded the frame!

I think you need to read the posts again with a sensible head on tbh.

By the way, you could have avoided any doubt by clearing the table if it was as easy as you describe....

i do have a sensible head on

i just dont like playing in a competition where the rules change to suit - or leave themselves open to dispute

to order a frame replayed with out taking the facts into account shouldnt happen

nothing against either guy - just wont play in the competition

Thanks

Snooks

He says he was disconnected; you say he left on purpose. His word against yours.
You also said in the beginning that he left "halfway through the frame". Now you're saying it was with two reds left hanging over the pockets.

All I can look at is the score- 29-25 in a snooker frame. This is usually not grounds for cheating. If there was a 30-50 points difference, you would get the frame. Also, if you had cleared the supposedly easy reds, you would've won the frame.

But anyway, he has conceded the frame, so you could just play.... if you don't want to, stuartl2011 will just go into the next round.

ive got him to play the last few games.. and there wasnt two reds.. not going to argue but the frame had only just started there was at least 6 or more reds :)

Which is reflected in this statement as well:

Round2
Stuartl2011 (3) vs. (2) Sn00kWizard

Arcade: Stuartl2011
Regular: Stuartl2011
Original: Sn00kWizard
Carom: SnookWizard
Power: Stuartl2011 218-75 (sn00kwizard leaves game with 38 seconds left on the clock)

That's fair enough Stu... No need to stir bud

WD BTW

im not saying no more on the matter :)