Hey Guys,

Me and Most of My killer buddys think that the Killer ranking system is unfair especially in big games like 10 man+.


We think that instead of losing ranking points if you come 2nd you s get some as you do all that work for nothing and get the same or less ranking points then someone who came 10th.

We think it should have some order too it so if you come 10th you should lose the most ranking points. And so on till the winner gets most ranking points with 2nd and maybe 3rd also gaining some rankings

that would bring more tactics into the game. winner takes all is best sorry m8

yeh the winner takes all suits the ruthless style that killer is supposed to be about.
In my opinion the game would lose its edge if this was to happen.
I do see your point though, its very annoying when you go deep in a 10 or 15 man, but it just adds to the drama

Winner takes all but maybe have 2nd and 3rd losing less points than they would? Just a little compromise between the two

that would probs be nice

bad idea. would make the game even easier for high rank players. killer is an all or nothing game.

I suggest if you don't want to lose ranking, try and win . Worked for me .