I'm talking about everyone who's ever been top. I believe mike, boz_lad & sean_paul all have been top of max rankings but did'nt appear on the chart for there own respective reasons. And just to let you know, there's ten other people on that max rank chart that will be effected not just you! I also worked hard to get 985 and it was'nt easy. Show some respect for your fellow members.

And what are you on about "rolling over and letting it happen" you aint got a say in the matter really fella, if Nick's going to change it, it get's changed. And dont patronise me with the childish bold sentence at the end mate. I said that to you for the fact i wanted to hear your opinion, not because i was acting like a kid ste.

Edited at 18:31 Tue 30/12/08 (GMT)

Tough week Ry? Bless ya...


Let's just agree with what all Youngjeezy said

There you go again ste, disrespectful. Remember that time when i dedicated a few cents that i got after a real bad week of play, and you turned round and said "ry instead of dedicating every single cent, just dedicate your max's" and i turned round and said "sorry ste did'nt wanna take up your space" having a laugh, so you put a dedi up sayin "i dedicate all my 107's to youngjeezy, o and the one i got today too" your big headedness and disrespect.

Ste were all in the same boat about the "max rank" malarky. An you must think your the only one in it. At the end of the day it started as an opinion, but now it's just going too far. I wondered why wee_wheels was arguing with you but now i see its because of your disrespect for other people's opinions. Yeah he did acuse you of cheating, and that was wrong but so has alot of other members aswell.

Back on topic... i think most disagree with whats going to happen with the max rankings and all, but then again we'll just have to get on with it.

ladies ladies.... heres a thought... in this infamous update wont it be possible to convert all the frames played over the duration of arcade snooker to the new points system? that way ste would still be top sadly, and it wont jeopardize my position at the top either? if i aint explained very well i do apologize.

Lol m8, dont know if it could be done, but is a very good idea in that respect.

OK,

1) Previous maximum values will remain but renamed to "previous"

a) Top 50 table will still exist (labelled "previous")

b) Value will remain on your profile (labelled "previous") so long as you managed to achieve 850+.

2) Everyone's current ranking points will be reduced by 50% of the amount over 675. eg someone on 925 -> 800.

The old ranking scores will remain on the high score tables and on everyone's statuses for 1 year. After that time it will be reviewed.

Edited at 16:10 Wed 31/12/08 (GMT)

I know people that would be satisfied with a hall of fame being put in place for it and the max ranks added there, i was talking to my mate bigbaz199, he wasn't happy because he believes his 977 (which is in top 10 for highest rank on orig) is his only massive achievement and is proud of it, however, he wasn't happy at the sound of them being reset but would be happy if it went into a hall of fame as it still recognises his achievement.

EDIT:



I would rather have a new page on the right side called "hall of fame". You could put all the main achievements in there aswell as the current max rankings.

Edited at 16:15 Wed 31/12/08 (GMT)

I like the sound of that. Right thing to do IMO.

Nick are you gonig to do it today then?

I thought the ratio was to be 80% of anything over 675.

I like the sound of that, nice one.

If he puts it at 50% then people can work up the rank again and get the high ranks, set the %age to high and the rank that will be left from then will be unreachable.

Precisely

...and working our way up again is much more fun

What about bribing?

If your going do it can't you do it today?

yes and i said sorry for that... u need to chill out ste people on this site care about u and your desrespecting that. i no alot of people on this site dont like me but i dont mind i no there good people good friends of yours and the way your going on there wont be many left so this stops right here right now

Edited at 19:07 Wed 31/12/08 (GMT)