Rank resetting: Arcade and Original games
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
19:10 Thu 1 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
do u know the table bigger or smaller
i think it came out on funky pool first
then transfered to to funky snooker
i could be wrong though
i think it came out on funky pool first
then transfered to to funky snooker
i could be wrong though
19:11 Thu 1 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
well it wouldnt suprise me since pool get all the latest gear before us.
19:24 Thu 1 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
Opinions on this?
virtuoso107 said:
This was clearly the best solution but do we have to have it on our profiles? Can't we just have the tables? Cause quite frankly it makes the profile stats quite messy.
Opinions on this?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
19:30 Thu 1 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
I like it, i think it should be kept the same.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
19:41 Thu 1 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
Thats what i think
Edited at 01:45 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
ste_efc said:
I like it, i think it should be kept the same.
Thats what i think
Edited at 01:45 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
19:42 Thu 1 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
Edited at 01:42 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
I agree.
Edited at 01:44 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
virtuoso107 said:
This was clearly the best solution but do we have to have it on our profiles? Can't we just have the tables? Cause quite frankly it makes the profile stats quite messy.
Edited at 01:42 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
I agree.
Edited at 01:44 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
19:50 Thu 1 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
Edited at 01:42 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
I agree.
Edited at 01:44 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
Agreed.
youngjeezy said:
virtuoso107 said:
This was clearly the best solution but do we have to have it on our profiles? Can't we just have the tables? Cause quite frankly it makes the profile stats quite messy.
Edited at 01:42 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
I agree.
Edited at 01:44 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
Agreed.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
19:53 Thu 1 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
i too agree.
virtuoso107 said:
This was clearly the best solution but do we have to have it on our profiles? Can't we just have the tables? Cause quite frankly it makes the profile stats quite messy.
i too agree.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
04:24 Fri 2 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
The original table came out first, but on pool on here. After several month arcade snooker was introduced.
Stop moaning, you are totally wrong, we just got regular snooker, and little things like the chat area size came on here first i believe.
If you think that its unfair on us then you are totally wrong. Look at all the work recently nick has done on here, you can not complain at that.
And anway when pool does get some updates first, they are testing it for us and seeing if there are any problems with it.
So you might want to go and get your facts right.
As for the rankings, i personally see nothing wrong with how they are.
bmx_leon said:
do u know the table bigger or smaller
i think it came out on funky pool first
then transfered to to funky snooker
i could be wrong though
i think it came out on funky pool first
then transfered to to funky snooker
i could be wrong though
The original table came out first, but on pool on here. After several month arcade snooker was introduced.
dgeneratio said:
well it wouldnt suprise me since pool get all the latest gear before us.
Stop moaning, you are totally wrong, we just got regular snooker, and little things like the chat area size came on here first i believe.
If you think that its unfair on us then you are totally wrong. Look at all the work recently nick has done on here, you can not complain at that.
And anway when pool does get some updates first, they are testing it for us and seeing if there are any problems with it.
So you might want to go and get your facts right.
As for the rankings, i personally see nothing wrong with how they are.
05:02 Fri 2 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
I disagree, keep it on our profiles
virtuoso107 said:
This was clearly the best solution but do we have to have it on our profiles? Can't we just have the tables? Cause quite frankly it makes the profile stats quite messy.
I disagree, keep it on our profiles
05:28 Fri 2 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
I disagree, keep it on our profiles
Agree with Si. What about the people who weren't in the top 50? They just lose the recording of their ranks. To be honest, I don't really see how it looks messy, and it's a lot fairer for everyone who got above 850 to keep the recording of their rank like was originally said by Nick...
si123 said:
virtuoso107 said:
This was clearly the best solution but do we have to have it on our profiles? Can't we just have the tables? Cause quite frankly it makes the profile stats quite messy.
I disagree, keep it on our profiles
Agree with Si. What about the people who weren't in the top 50? They just lose the recording of their ranks. To be honest, I don't really see how it looks messy, and it's a lot fairer for everyone who got above 850 to keep the recording of their rank like was originally said by Nick...
05:35 Fri 2 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
Thats what i think
Edited at 01:45 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
Me to (please kept the same)
the_kop said:
ste_efc said:
I like it, i think it should be kept the same.
Thats what i think
Edited at 01:45 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
Me to (please kept the same)
06:27 Fri 2 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
I disagree, keep it on our profiles
Agree with Si. What about the people who weren't in the top 50? They just lose the recording of their ranks. To be honest, I don't really see how it looks messy, and it's a lot fairer for everyone who got above 850 to keep the recording of their rank like was originally said by Nick...
The way I see it there only numbers anyway with them being taken away it doesn't alter the fact that you once reached that number, just jot it down on your about me, keeping the stats on your profile tidy, if everyone didn't want this as I'm sure they won't but maybe an option to show previous on profiles?
EDIT : Or better yet why not have everyones top rank on the tables? Effectively creating a hall of fame so to speak.
Edited at 12:30 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
toontomh said:
si123 said:
virtuoso107 said:
This was clearly the best solution but do we have to have it on our profiles? Can't we just have the tables? Cause quite frankly it makes the profile stats quite messy.
I disagree, keep it on our profiles
Agree with Si. What about the people who weren't in the top 50? They just lose the recording of their ranks. To be honest, I don't really see how it looks messy, and it's a lot fairer for everyone who got above 850 to keep the recording of their rank like was originally said by Nick...
The way I see it there only numbers anyway with them being taken away it doesn't alter the fact that you once reached that number, just jot it down on your about me, keeping the stats on your profile tidy, if everyone didn't want this as I'm sure they won't but maybe an option to show previous on profiles?
EDIT : Or better yet why not have everyones top rank on the tables? Effectively creating a hall of fame so to speak.
Edited at 12:30 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
07:26 Fri 2 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
It's one extra stat on your profile... How does that make it look messy. Anyway, I'd prefer to have a very messy profile with all my stats on there and my past achievements rather than a tidy looking profile but not showing what (In my case) took me around two years to get to...
Edited at 13:27 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
Edited at 13:27 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:33 Fri 2 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
Its doing no harm where it is, new ststas are coming out all the time, its not exactly and eyesore.
Edited at 13:34 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
Edited at 13:34 Fri 2/01/09 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:44 Fri 2 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
I disagree, keep it on our profiles
Agree with Si. What about the people who weren't in the top 50? They just lose the recording of their ranks. To be honest, I don't really see how it looks messy, and it's a lot fairer for everyone who got above 850 to keep the recording of their rank like was originally said by Nick...
Good point Tom.
toontomh said:
si123 said:
virtuoso107 said:
This was clearly the best solution but do we have to have it on our profiles? Can't we just have the tables? Cause quite frankly it makes the profile stats quite messy.
I disagree, keep it on our profiles
Agree with Si. What about the people who weren't in the top 50? They just lose the recording of their ranks. To be honest, I don't really see how it looks messy, and it's a lot fairer for everyone who got above 850 to keep the recording of their rank like was originally said by Nick...
Good point Tom.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
11:37 Fri 2 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
taking the best of both sides, maybe keep it on profile, but tidy it, changing (previous) to Previous
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
12:07 Fri 2 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
take it out of brackets and put a capital yes
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
19:18 Fri 2 Jan 09 (GMT) [Link]
Hmm... that could actually tidy things up.
pieceofpig said:
taking the best of both sides, maybe keep it on profile, but tidy it, changing (previous) to Previous
Hmm... that could actually tidy things up.
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
Rank resetting: Arcade and Original games
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.