Football Results and Reactions
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Sports Chat.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:03 Sun 20 Sep 09 (BST) [Link]
Cmon City n spurs!!!
Edited at 13:56 Sun 20/09/09 (BST)
Edited at 13:56 Sun 20/09/09 (BST)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
10:44 Sun 20 Sep 09 (BST) [Link]
Slurguson and his mafia up to their old tricks again.
Don't think at any other ground with any other team is 90 seconds mysteriously added on. Well played Atkinson, maybe Fergie wont call you a joke anymore.
Pityful reli.
Don't think at any other ground with any other team is 90 seconds mysteriously added on. Well played Atkinson, maybe Fergie wont call you a joke anymore.
Pityful reli.
11:51 Sun 20 Sep 09 (BST) [Link]
However.
This happend last weekend with chelsea when they scores in injury time against stoke so...
This happend last weekend with chelsea when they scores in injury time against stoke so...
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
12:57 Sun 20 Sep 09 (BST) [Link]
Chelsea are just as bad for it as well.
We score late goals, but never after the allotted time is up.
Pfft
We score late goals, but never after the allotted time is up.
Pfft
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:44 Sun 20 Sep 09 (BST) [Link]
Was cheering on City today but i think they were robbed of a point.
Only at Old Trafford would 4 mins injury time end up as 7 mins.
But thats the prem for ya
Only at Old Trafford would 4 mins injury time end up as 7 mins.
But thats the prem for ya
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:54 Sun 20 Sep 09 (BST) [Link]
ref had to give a few more minutes for the sub and for citys goal.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:16 Sun 20 Sep 09 (BST) [Link]
They scored in the 6th min of extra time, and i very much doubt the sub took 2 mins to come on. Thats a pretty feeble excuse
danny_glover said:
ref had to give a few more minutes for the sub and for citys goal.
They scored in the 6th min of extra time, and i very much doubt the sub took 2 mins to come on. Thats a pretty feeble excuse
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:18 Sun 20 Sep 09 (BST) [Link]
so if liverpool was playing everton and everton scored in the 92nd min when the ref gave 4 min of injury time you wouldn't expect the ref to play an extra minute or two because of goal celebrations. thats what it is like.
they should bring the stop the clock rule in
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:33 Sun 20 Sep 09 (BST) [Link]
They scored in the 6th minute of injury time when they should have only had 4 mins so they were 2 mins overdue before the goal which should never have happened. The celebrations are irrelevent.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:07 Sun 20 Sep 09 (BST) [Link]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:O :O
What are you insinuating there!?
:O :O
What are you insinuating there!?
05:19 Mon 21 Sep 09 (BST) [Link]
To be fair, it's been over this on MoTD and SSN and they took into account the Man City celebrations and the substitute and with them there was 1 minute 25 seconds of stoppages in stoppage time, the goal was scored 1 minute 27 seconds after.
Now they do get a lot of extra, extra time, but in yesterday's case it was probably just good refereeing.
Now they do get a lot of extra, extra time, but in yesterday's case it was probably just good refereeing.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:58 Mon 21 Sep 09 (BST) [Link]
I dont buy that rubbish, in the champions league in 2007 in Athens, AC Milan made a sub in injury time and 3 minutes was added on, time added on was 2 mins 40 seconds. So 70 seconds to early?
So many times this happens and never has that amount been added on. Only cos it was at OT that 4 minutes was added on in the 1st place!!
to be fair, I dont think City's 1st goal should have been allowed cos Foster had both hands on the ball.
Swings and roundabouts..... perhaps.
toontomh said:
To be fair, it's been over this on MoTD and SSN and they took into account the Man City celebrations and the substitute and with them there was 1 minute 25 seconds of stoppages in stoppage time, the goal was scored 1 minute 27 seconds after.
Now they do get a lot of extra, extra time, but in yesterday's case it was probably just good refereeing.
Now they do get a lot of extra, extra time, but in yesterday's case it was probably just good refereeing.
I dont buy that rubbish, in the champions league in 2007 in Athens, AC Milan made a sub in injury time and 3 minutes was added on, time added on was 2 mins 40 seconds. So 70 seconds to early?
So many times this happens and never has that amount been added on. Only cos it was at OT that 4 minutes was added on in the 1st place!!
to be fair, I dont think City's 1st goal should have been allowed cos Foster had both hands on the ball.
Swings and roundabouts..... perhaps.
10:50 Mon 21 Sep 09 (BST) [Link]
Not now, not ever! I hope you didn't go through with getting it?
fly_53 said:
You got the Newcastle away kit yet tom?
Not now, not ever! I hope you didn't go through with getting it?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:51 Mon 21 Sep 09 (BST) [Link]
Agreed tom, that was good referring yesterday, was 1 second out, how can you expect any ref to be dead on? Every team has had luck or no luck in stoppage time that's what makes football so good... Also City have to blame themself because there defending was a joke
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
Football Results and Reactions
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Sports Chat.
Back to Forum List.