right next season im changing a rule about subs,

subs only got put there because to swap with people who are unable to play.

instead we have someone who swaps some reliable people for unreliable ones

ive noticed 1 person from a certain clan is abusing this by doing a whole clan makeover well it stops.

subs is there for changing people who are unreliable for reliable players.

so it ends now.

Well it ends at the start of next season.

i agree with this
theres a deadline and if he cant be bothered to get his team intime
he cant change his whole team because he didnt send it in time.

shhh you

peg just given me an idea.

peg wants the point system to be like football.

3 for win
1 for draw
0 for loss

what do you all think?

If you want my advice, i think its better way it is now, do you think frames for and against should stay on the site if we keep it the way it is now?

Edited at 14:10 Sun 04/07/10 (BST)

Yeh i just think it seems alot fairer. pretty classic system

What you need to do is settle on one complete set of rules. Can't keep changing rules after every season. Find a set of rules covering everything and stick with it.

The thin is with Arpeggi's idea is do the team get 3 points for beating another clan, or does a player get 3 points for beating their opponent. (in which case a team could get 21 points from the whole match)?

beating an opponent i would think and yeah i agree totally.

Yeh each player gets 3 points for a win. Seems better.

And also rules need to be changed along the way. This is fairly new, and a competition needs time to grow, and we need to adapt with it

ill wait to see what other people think before i decide to put this into action or not.

forget it, stupid idea

Edited at 10:06 Mon 26/07/10 (BST)

Why would you want to change it to that?

change what, clan league is still the same no matter what

I don't get it then. lol

it was just another side league thing, like bonus and ind halfs and cents.

i understand your situation now mate and now i feel like i did your default wrong 5-1 would have been fairer, i apologise and thanks Jack for sticking up for me.

I will do defaults a little bit different next season.

maybe we need a defaults team perhaps, players of the teams with defaults can't have a say, how about that?

example:

cue_power vs dgeneratio

the default team would discuss based on messages and activity logs (in game would favour over browsing which is better than being offline), but UT and D&C players would not be able to comment,

thoughts?

I am also in the Pool Defaults Team as well which hopefully will help with next seasons defaults as i can see how they do it.

now lets draw a line under cues default problem and lets start over to make this league better for everyone.

We should not need defaults, captains should be made to put in a sub if the player has been offline for 6 days then there would be no defaults and no whinging.

we talked about it last season but we agreed we always need defaults.

an idea previously thought of by damee (now eemad) how about a clan must last 1 season before they can enter?

I think the default commitee should include captain (or member) of each team, so one person from each team. Each should give the result they think is right...

Say if 2 teams feel it should be 6-0 to one player...and another 2 give 6-0 to the other player, then its ovbiously 3-3.

So work the average, or mode of the selections and use that.

Seems fair that way.