so whos in this defaults team then:

1 member from each clan needed (if possible)

so far -

dgeneratio

since you are running the league i take it there is still room for a dollars and cents representative?

if so stick me name down. was gonna ask when you were setting up a team with the new rules coming in next season

are we doing this so 1 person does 1 fixture? for example:

untouchables vs thunder hawx - dgeneratio does the defaults for this fixture

allstarz vs punishers - virt_slayer does the defults for this fixture

and so on.

obviously we cant do defaults for our own clan fixtures or else we may be biased

zacrh1no and mojoboy786 for hawxs james

Yeah Derry, it is a bit of a rubbish idea lol, I was just throwing it out there.

I think a defaults "team" is a bit excessive. Maybe just give people the opportunity to say what they think the results should be.

Jame what about to make sure every clan is active every clanhas got to have a friendly again a other clan to make sure that they active and it would worth putting them in!

I think James already has this in, but for new clans.

ooooo

i did have it in but it was a bad idea, damee suggested new clans have to last 1 or 2 months before they can enter the league but thats not in place yet either.

I need a final choice on this defaults team, is it going ahead?

If it does not go ahead what do you think i should do about defaults?

Edited at 13:55 Sun 01/08/10 (BST)

i dont want that default team go ahead

James you could lets us how the default would like so it can not change if you get me e.g



6-0 becuase player is not active
late sub 4-2 inactive player
Active but could not find player 3-3 Active but could not find player

I think the default team has a good foundation, but i reckon alot of the games would end up in a debate tbh.

I think dgen should carry on with the defaults, but should have some1 else on his team, say a neutral then the two of them could iron out the defaults?

Also i dont like the "browsing counting" to be fair say if i had a game and it was against say arpeggi in orig and i new id get slaughtered.. if i was the sort of player to cheat or worm his way around things i could just browse for a while and dodge the game, to get a 4-2 or a 5-1 and just say i tried to put some effort in..

Anyone elses opinion?

well (ill use your example of you vs arpeggi) if arpeggi sent you a message and you arranged the time for this game if you didnt show up because you were trying to get it on default you would lose on default anyway.

it all comes down to messaging rather than activity i think. If everyone could arrange a time via messaging then the less active player would maybe have to make a special effort to get online but it would get played and if not you would win on default if they didnt turn up

Sorry i forgot to mention that part..
Lots of people on here say that they have sent messages and got no reply, i meant to say if i was to ignore messages just to avoid losing 6-0 but browsed alot.. Then i wouldnt get a 6-0 against me?

Browsing is pointless if your not actively replying to or sending a message.

if you avoid messages and refuse or avoid their pms or perhaps put them on ignore you should be given a 5-1 loss i reckon

If you look at the defaults though the players who were defaulted nearly 60% of them have not been on for like 4 week so really captains should take responsibility for not subbing players who have been offline for ages.
There should be a rule where captains should be made to do a sub if a player has not been online for seven days then makes it easy for everyone and less defaults.

5-1???

That needs to be 6-0.

This is my point, there will always be disagreements with defaults.

I think there needs to be a member from each clan (the most honest and reliable) should cast their decision. Out of all the casted decisions give either the most common result, or the average of the results.

There will be favourtism and results given negativley or in the wrong fashion just because people wont like a certain player, but if the majority of the selected members from each clan is sensible then it should work.

I personally feel that I wouldnt be bias in any way and think candidates should possess my qualities

I think this is the best way.

Or we stick with the old system...

a Forum has been made on the site, regarding the Defaults Team

You can see this here...

http://funkysnookerclanleague.yolasite.com/forum.php#/