power killer
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
22:44 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
Obviously only to you....
The amount of flaws people have brought up has made me change....
The amount of flaws people have brought up has made me change....
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:02 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
I'm sorry but you want regular killer players, that obviously play killer because they enjoy it, to like a changed version of the game. However when people that dont play the current version (the people that are most likely to play your version) give their opinions you dismiss them. Your clueless fella
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:13 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
You want only 4 pockets? You can barely make a pot with 6 pockets!
But seriously, rubbish idea. Pot the black and take a life from every player? So I could be eliminated without even missing a ball?
But seriously, rubbish idea. Pot the black and take a life from every player? So I could be eliminated without even missing a ball?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:14 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
You're* sorry another pet hate.
Cut the guy some slack man, if anyone else would have posted it you wouldn't have been half as criticizing.
The idea itself, with a few tweaks here and there mind, is actually quite good. (ie picking who to take a life from instead of it being everyone.) How can a game not be made better by adding thrill to it? That's the suggestion here after all.
Cut the guy some slack man, if anyone else would have posted it you wouldn't have been half as criticizing.
The idea itself, with a few tweaks here and there mind, is actually quite good. (ie picking who to take a life from instead of it being everyone.) How can a game not be made better by adding thrill to it? That's the suggestion here after all.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:16 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
I agree with it been on a regular table or giving people the option
Disagree on the other ideas though.
greatest said:
10 reds
3 blacks ( pot a black and it takes a life from every opponent)
regular table
every player gets a bye so they can skip a shot
only 4 pockets to be used(winner of previous round chooses which to omit)
sounds like a great idea to me,what do you reckon? Please no abuse.
3 blacks ( pot a black and it takes a life from every opponent)
regular table
every player gets a bye so they can skip a shot
only 4 pockets to be used(winner of previous round chooses which to omit)
sounds like a great idea to me,what do you reckon? Please no abuse.
I agree with it been on a regular table or giving people the option
Disagree on the other ideas though.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:19 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
How do you know how he would have posted? He is entitled to his opinion just as much as you.
fernando said:
Cut the guy some slack man, if anyone else would have posted it you wouldn't have been half as criticizing.
How do you know how he would have posted? He is entitled to his opinion just as much as you.
23:20 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
I agree with it been on a regular table or giving people the option
Disagree on the other ideas though.
nice one fella
max_is_back said:
greatest said:
10 reds
3 blacks ( pot a black and it takes a life from every opponent)
regular table
every player gets a bye so they can skip a shot
only 4 pockets to be used(winner of previous round chooses which to omit)
sounds like a great idea to me,what do you reckon? Please no abuse.
3 blacks ( pot a black and it takes a life from every opponent)
regular table
every player gets a bye so they can skip a shot
only 4 pockets to be used(winner of previous round chooses which to omit)
sounds like a great idea to me,what do you reckon? Please no abuse.
I agree with it been on a regular table or giving people the option
Disagree on the other ideas though.
nice one fella
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:20 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
I don't know how he would have posted but that wasn't my point, my point was because of previously controversial thread he'd been on no-one was willing to give the idea a chance.
23:22 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
yeah but that was something which was never going to happen.
ive said for a while i wouldnt mind killer on regular table but dont like the rest.
ive said for a while i wouldnt mind killer on regular table but dont like the rest.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:24 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
Again you are assuming that's why people are against this.
I said the 4 pocket thing as a joke because the bloke is a bit of a muppet and wanted to get that out of the way.
I'm just against the idea because of how badly flawed it is. It could have been somebody I like posting and it still would have been a poor idea.
I was even against power snooker and that was suggested by the owner of the site...
fernando said:
I don't know how he would have posted but that wasn't my point, my point was because of previously controversial thread he'd been on no-one was willing to give the idea a chance.
Again you are assuming that's why people are against this.
I said the 4 pocket thing as a joke because the bloke is a bit of a muppet and wanted to get that out of the way.
I'm just against the idea because of how badly flawed it is. It could have been somebody I like posting and it still would have been a poor idea.
I was even against power snooker and that was suggested by the owner of the site...
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:25 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
Well how many other ideas on here never happen? You're not so quick to criticize them are you?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:32 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
I'm not assuming anything, look how dismissive both posts are, now I'm fairly certain if a different member would have posted the idea, for one; if those two didn't like it they probably wouldn't have posted and two; on the off chance they did post they wouldn't have posted like that.
All I'm saying is give the idea a chance, add to it, try and improve it, don't just dismiss it because of the creator.
2hot2handle said:
Crap idea
dgeneratio said:
not been round long then.
johnnydollar said:
Again you are assuming that's why people are against this.
I'm not assuming anything, look how dismissive both posts are, now I'm fairly certain if a different member would have posted the idea, for one; if those two didn't like it they probably wouldn't have posted and two; on the off chance they did post they wouldn't have posted like that.
All I'm saying is give the idea a chance, add to it, try and improve it, don't just dismiss it because of the creator.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:43 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
Then you don't know what an assumption is...
I can dismiss an idea if I don't like it. I don't have to add to it. It's my opinion and you have yours. Deal with it.
I can dismiss an idea if I don't like it. I don't have to add to it. It's my opinion and you have yours. Deal with it.
23:46 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
Edited at 22:39 Sun 31/10/10 (GMT)
Edited at 22:39 Sun 31/10/10 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:48 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
What's your problem? All I've said is give the idea a chance, but this means I'm telling you not to have an opinion?
I never said you have to add to it, I said don't just dismiss it because you don't like the creator, and by you I don't mean you personally I mean everyone, so please don't try and take the high horse route by telling me to deal with it, I've dealt with hence why I posted.
I never said you have to add to it, I said don't just dismiss it because you don't like the creator, and by you I don't mean you personally I mean everyone, so please don't try and take the high horse route by telling me to deal with it, I've dealt with hence why I posted.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:52 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
We all read it, we gave it a chance, and the majority have decided that they are against it !
Simple !
Simple !
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:53 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
No problem, you just aren't respecting my opinion at all. I respect your opinion because I can see why you are for the idea - it's something new and new games are exciting.
You fail to see why I'm against it - because it's badly flawed. That's all you need to see. Nothing to do with the thread starter. I'm not explaining again so try to understand this time.
You fail to see why I'm against it - because it's badly flawed. That's all you need to see. Nothing to do with the thread starter. I'm not explaining again so try to understand this time.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:56 Sun 31 Oct 10 (GMT) [Link]
I agree with it been on a regular table or giving people the option
Disagree on the other ideas though.
nice one fella
http://www.funkysnooker.com/thread/7340/killer-table-size
Some more opinions there on the size of tables for killer
greatest said:
max_is_back said:
greatest said:
10 reds
3 blacks ( pot a black and it takes a life from every opponent)
regular table
every player gets a bye so they can skip a shot
only 4 pockets to be used(winner of previous round chooses which to omit)
sounds like a great idea to me,what do you reckon? Please no abuse.
3 blacks ( pot a black and it takes a life from every opponent)
regular table
every player gets a bye so they can skip a shot
only 4 pockets to be used(winner of previous round chooses which to omit)
sounds like a great idea to me,what do you reckon? Please no abuse.
I agree with it been on a regular table or giving people the option
Disagree on the other ideas though.
nice one fella
http://www.funkysnooker.com/thread/7340/killer-table-size
Some more opinions there on the size of tables for killer
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
power killer
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.