is there any way we can lag for a re spot black.. because i havent won it for months and its got silly..

ive only had 2 re spots won in about 26 games this year and its getting annoying.. i would prefer to lag for it and see who deserves it ?

yh is a good idea cause you get all the pro and virt who pot straight away

no you get anyone who pots straight away.. its getting ridiculous.. 2 goes out of 26 attempts.. some glitch against me lol

its 50/50 fair as it is, what if someone doesn't know how to lag then its unfair on them and its not officially a snooker rule.

you don't need to be a pro or virt to pot the black on the re-spot, it isn't difficult.

This has been mentioned many times in the past and every time it gets the same answer, the current system is exactly in accordance with the rules of the real game and shouldn't be changed.

Virt, you have just been unlucky not to get them, but you may get 24 in the next 26 so who knows.

yh i havent played against anybody who haas missed the black, and i never even got to try!

Additional problem would be cheatlags. So no, definitely against this.
Keep it as it is.

i would love to see someone try the cheat lag on the orig table seb .

its always gone against me, and i mean always, and its stupid.. 50/50 ?

its more like 80% against me and 20 with me

Too funny Not to quote

I'm sure someone would find one in no time...

im sure destibot could

sorry, cheatlags???

where's damien when you need him?

As everyone says though, you have to where possible apply the real laws to this game and that is what is in place with the re-spot.

I'm here Adam don't worry

It's amazing how many people think everything goes against them. You very rarely remember the ones which go your way yet always remember the ones which go against you. Over a long period I'm sure it is close to 50/50 for all users.

whats a lag? or cheatlag?

like on carom, you play the ball at the opposite side to bounce back to the side u were on before, closest ball to the starting side wins

A cheat lag is when you use the opponents half to bounce back to your own

surely nick would be able to code it so you cant touch the other half of the table?

Whether he could or not is immaterial seeing as the current method is perfectly fine as it is and therefore unlikely to change.

True for this thread, although carom could use it