Ranking Threshold
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:36 Wed 30 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
If they have chosen to ignore invites, they dont have an intrest in playing. No problem there.
Emmm, yes there is a problem. Apart from tournaments I hardly ever receive an invite, perhaps on the rare odd occasion or two. Though I have great interest in playing and am sure others do to.
Yes, at the moment you can choose who you play, but as it's not a core part of the game, very few people do
Well then by all fairness you are wrong, everyone has a look at there opponents rank before starting a game. A 900 plus well never welcome a 600 rank again and again, its human nature to be competitive.
spinner said:
If they have chosen to ignore invites, they dont have an intrest in playing. No problem there.
Emmm, yes there is a problem. Apart from tournaments I hardly ever receive an invite, perhaps on the rare odd occasion or two. Though I have great interest in playing and am sure others do to.
spinner said:
Yes, at the moment you can choose who you play, but as it's not a core part of the game, very few people do
Well then by all fairness you are wrong, everyone has a look at there opponents rank before starting a game. A 900 plus well never welcome a 600 rank again and again, its human nature to be competitive.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:37 Wed 30 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
If one of these systems were introduced, then things would change. For example, take an average win, assuming you play everyone who enters your room, at being 7 points, however, an average win if you never play anyone under 900 rank would be around the 10 mark.
That means after 10 wins, the person using the facility has won 30 points more than the player who hasn't.
Fair?
spinner said:
If one of these systems were introduced, then things would change. For example, take an average win, assuming you play everyone who enters your room, at being 7 points, however, an average win if you never play anyone under 900 rank would be around the 10 mark.
That means after 10 wins, the person using the facility has won 30 points more than the player who hasn't.
Fair?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:37 Wed 30 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
Nope, it’s being blown out of proportion. The simple fact is it makes sense to play others at a similar rank. Iv already explained myself on this thread on several occasions. But since its being ignored I’d like you to take a different perspective.
- Why cant small companies participate in the stock Exchange market, amongst blue chip companies?
- Why do boxers have to be in a specific weight class in order to fight?
- Why do we have different divisions in the football league?
- How about this one, an example a bit more relevant to this scenario… Why is there a premier league in snooker? http://www.premierleaguesnooker.com/
So now I’m going to be told that these billionaire companies, decades and decades of tradition, rules and regulations, leagues and so on and so forth have been all entirely a waste of time. Damn they must feel gutted.
- Why cant small companies participate in the stock Exchange market, amongst blue chip companies?
- Why do boxers have to be in a specific weight class in order to fight?
- Why do we have different divisions in the football league?
- How about this one, an example a bit more relevant to this scenario… Why is there a premier league in snooker? http://www.premierleaguesnooker.com/
So now I’m going to be told that these billionaire companies, decades and decades of tradition, rules and regulations, leagues and so on and so forth have been all entirely a waste of time. Damn they must feel gutted.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:37 Wed 30 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
If only they had listened to spinner and his sidekick support, hurricane147.
May I remind you hurricane147, we don’t care about your personal experiences. When I participate in an argument its on behalf of a lot of people. So it’s not exactly a wise idea saying that we moan.
Fair ?
May I remind you hurricane147, we don’t care about your personal experiences. When I participate in an argument its on behalf of a lot of people. So it’s not exactly a wise idea saying that we moan.
Fair ?
01:46 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
wrx. i dont understand the personal attacks. i am speaking for all the higher ranked players. havent you noticed you are the only one asking for this? does that not say something? - the fact is there are an awful lot of virtuoso players on snooker and if you want to play someone of similar rank it is easy just to join a game or make one with a name like "900 plus please"
you said "A 900 plus well never welcome a 600 rank again"
That is complete rubbish. you may find it acceptable not to welcome a okayer with lower rank, but most people i know are polite and happy to play anyopne.
the ranking calculation system takes care of the difference so there is no reason not to play.
"and again, its human nature to be competitive."
i agree. i want to compete, not discriminate.
i am all for progress, and progress would be removing the disrimination so that everyone can play. you are looking for a way to discriminate, and you already can as you say yourself
you said "A 900 plus well never welcome a 600 rank again"
That is complete rubbish. you may find it acceptable not to welcome a okayer with lower rank, but most people i know are polite and happy to play anyopne.
the ranking calculation system takes care of the difference so there is no reason not to play.
"and again, its human nature to be competitive."
i agree. i want to compete, not discriminate.
i am all for progress, and progress would be removing the disrimination so that everyone can play. you are looking for a way to discriminate, and you already can as you say yourself
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
05:39 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
Its not personal attacks, its frustration that’s all. Read on, you’ll catch the drift. The fact that people ignore what you’ve just said.
Your reply hasn’t answered any of my above questions, prior to your post. So I guess I was just wasting my time.
Well you’re certainly not speaking for me, or the people that I know. Perhaps you had an annual meeting where you was voted spokesman for the high rankers.
Well considering its not me who started this post... if you READ this thread you will notice that funkyjess raised this issue, you will also find others have agreed.
hurricane147 said:
wrx. i dont understand the personal attacks.
Its not personal attacks, its frustration that’s all. Read on, you’ll catch the drift. The fact that people ignore what you’ve just said.
Your reply hasn’t answered any of my above questions, prior to your post. So I guess I was just wasting my time.
hurricane147 said:
i am speaking for all the higher ranked players.
Well you’re certainly not speaking for me, or the people that I know. Perhaps you had an annual meeting where you was voted spokesman for the high rankers.
hurricane147 said:
havent you noticed you are the only one asking for this? does that not say something?
Well considering its not me who started this post... if you READ this thread you will notice that funkyjess raised this issue, you will also find others have agreed.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
05:39 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
Frustration again, since you have not READ this thread carefully you wasting your time. READ for crying out loud. I have answered this on more then one occasion.
When you say “most people that you know” do you mean 3,4,5,6players or everyone? The fact that you think I’m wrong is frustrating. You think iv written post after post because I enjoy doing it.. its some sought of secret fetish of mine..?
hurricane147 said:
the fact is there are an awful lot of virtuoso players on snooker and if you want to play someone of similar rank it is easy just to join a game or make one with a name like "900 plus please"
Frustration again, since you have not READ this thread carefully you wasting your time. READ for crying out loud. I have answered this on more then one occasion.
hurricane147 said:
you may find it acceptable not to welcome a okayer with lower rank, but most people i know are polite and happy to play anyopne.
When you say “most people that you know” do you mean 3,4,5,6players or everyone? The fact that you think I’m wrong is frustrating. You think iv written post after post because I enjoy doing it.. its some sought of secret fetish of mine..?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
05:39 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
lol this is seriously turning into a joke, first I’m charged of the following by spinner:
“Abusing the facility, being unfair, deliberately and falsely increasing rank”
and now hurricane147 says I’m discriminating. As well as:
Not forgetting being accused of personal attacks, hmm I wonder why...
Well thanks for these beautiful accusations guys, what a productive way of debating.
Can’t wait to hear what’s next?
hurricane147 said:
the ranking calculation system takes care of the difference so there is no reason not to play.
"and again, its human nature to be competitive."
i agree. i want to compete, not discriminate.
"and again, its human nature to be competitive."
i agree. i want to compete, not discriminate.
lol this is seriously turning into a joke, first I’m charged of the following by spinner:
“Abusing the facility, being unfair, deliberately and falsely increasing rank”
and now hurricane147 says I’m discriminating. As well as:
hurricane147 said:
some ppl moan that lower players blah blah
Not forgetting being accused of personal attacks, hmm I wonder why...
hurricane147 said:
you are looking for a way to discriminate, and you already can as you say yourself
Well thanks for these beautiful accusations guys, what a productive way of debating.
Can’t wait to hear what’s next?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
05:39 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
Iv come to a stage where I’m going to be copy and pasting a lot. Since majority of the questions are already answered. Either people haven’t read and jump to conclusions or they can’t read carefully enough. So here we go:
But since its being ignored I’d like you to take a different perspective.
- Why cant small companies participate in the stock Exchange market, amongst blue chip companies?
- Why do boxers have to be in a specific weight class in order to fight?
- Why do we have different divisions in the football league?
- How about this one, an example a bit more relevant to this scenario… Why is there a premier league in snooker? http://www.premierleaguesnooker.com/
So now I’m going to be told that these billionaire companies, decades and decades of tradition, rules and regulations, leagues and so on and so forth have been all entirely a waste of time. Damn they must feel gutted.
_wrx_ said:
But since its being ignored I’d like you to take a different perspective.
- Why cant small companies participate in the stock Exchange market, amongst blue chip companies?
- Why do boxers have to be in a specific weight class in order to fight?
- Why do we have different divisions in the football league?
- How about this one, an example a bit more relevant to this scenario… Why is there a premier league in snooker? http://www.premierleaguesnooker.com/
So now I’m going to be told that these billionaire companies, decades and decades of tradition, rules and regulations, leagues and so on and so forth have been all entirely a waste of time. Damn they must feel gutted.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
05:54 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
Guys people are allowed to disagree with you, you need to see both sides of an arguement, there is not just one view point here.
It is my belief that we should stick to what we have, in my opinion everybody, no matter what rank they may be should have the oppertunity to play whoever they desire. It seems to me that you are the minority here as everybody seems to be ok with the current set up, or are happy to join games.
Just having a quick look there are plenty of games saying 850 plus, 900 plus etc.. so just join one of them.
Now before we start quoting the whole of my post and ripping it apart remember, we are expressing our views here, if people dont agree then fine, but respect peoples opinions without saying they are childish etc..
Edited at 12:22 Thu 31/01/08 (GMT)
It is my belief that we should stick to what we have, in my opinion everybody, no matter what rank they may be should have the oppertunity to play whoever they desire. It seems to me that you are the minority here as everybody seems to be ok with the current set up, or are happy to join games.
Just having a quick look there are plenty of games saying 850 plus, 900 plus etc.. so just join one of them.
Now before we start quoting the whole of my post and ripping it apart remember, we are expressing our views here, if people dont agree then fine, but respect peoples opinions without saying they are childish etc..
Edited at 12:22 Thu 31/01/08 (GMT)
06:15 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
I'm sorry if i caused any fuss here. I was seeing only one viewpoint being expressed and i didnt like the idea of myself along with many of my mates, and the many other polite players who are higher ranked being "tarred with the same stick"
i have read all your posts wrx, very carefully, and some of the things you said were simply not in line with what i have seen and experienced through the years. the number of "over 900" etc games, as pointed out by 2good, further proves the point.
i saw somewhere that there are over 30000 members here now. the fact that only a few ever post about this issue shows that the majority enjoy things as they are.
there were a few suggestions here, the invite system and being able to see peoples rank before joining <without having to go to their profile> which do what you want without hindering others from playing as they do now.
surely compromise is the best way forward.
i have read all your posts wrx, very carefully, and some of the things you said were simply not in line with what i have seen and experienced through the years. the number of "over 900" etc games, as pointed out by 2good, further proves the point.
i saw somewhere that there are over 30000 members here now. the fact that only a few ever post about this issue shows that the majority enjoy things as they are.
there were a few suggestions here, the invite system and being able to see peoples rank before joining <without having to go to their profile> which do what you want without hindering others from playing as they do now.
surely compromise is the best way forward.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
06:27 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
I agree that bringing in a system that helps such people as _wrx_ and funkyjess but does not hinder those who want to play the 1st player to enter a room would be welcome. I guess at the end of the day it is down to Nick and what he sees fit to add to the site, if he thinks this is the best way to help the site grow and increase our in game experience then ultimately he will include it in any future updates that may be coming.
Indeed comprimese and respect for other peoples opinions is the best way forward, so people put your handbags back over your shoulders
Indeed comprimese and respect for other peoples opinions is the best way forward, so people put your handbags back over your shoulders
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:39 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
Now before we start quoting the whole of my post and ripping it apart remember, we are expressing our views here.
Well since spinner, an admin, was quoting me I thought there was nothing wrong with it. Also its pointless I type and type if I’ve already answered majority of the questions, so it makes sense for me to quote.
Yes we are expressing our views, that’s why time and time again I’ve had to remind people on this thread its not a one sided argument, it’s a debate, thus it takes two.
Lastly, I hope this will teach people how to debate a question. 1st you READ the 2nd parties arguments, then you elaborate on your opinion and thoughts in reference/ accordance to that arguments. You counter the person’s points. The way I have.
So please, prior to your reply i suggest you READ my previous posts in order to counter them.
2good said:
Now before we start quoting the whole of my post and ripping it apart remember, we are expressing our views here.
Well since spinner, an admin, was quoting me I thought there was nothing wrong with it. Also its pointless I type and type if I’ve already answered majority of the questions, so it makes sense for me to quote.
Yes we are expressing our views, that’s why time and time again I’ve had to remind people on this thread its not a one sided argument, it’s a debate, thus it takes two.
_wrx_ said:
Lastly, I hope this will teach people how to debate a question. 1st you READ the 2nd parties arguments, then you elaborate on your opinion and thoughts in reference/ accordance to that arguments. You counter the person’s points. The way I have.
So please, prior to your reply i suggest you READ my previous posts in order to counter them.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:40 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
but respect peoples opinions without saying they are childish etc..
Indeed comprimese and respect for other peoples opinions is the best way forward
I totally agree….
lol this is seriously turning into a joke, first I’m charged of the following by spinner:
“Abusing the facility, being unfair, deliberately and falsely increasing rank”
and now hurricane147 says I’m discriminating. As well as:
Not forgetting being accused of personal attacks, hmm I wonder why...
2good said:
but respect peoples opinions without saying they are childish etc..
2good said:
Indeed comprimese and respect for other peoples opinions is the best way forward
I totally agree….
_wrx_ said:
hurricane147 said:
the ranking calculation system takes care of the difference so there is no reason not to play.
"and again, its human nature to be competitive."
i agree. i want to compete, not discriminate.
"and again, its human nature to be competitive."
i agree. i want to compete, not discriminate.
lol this is seriously turning into a joke, first I’m charged of the following by spinner:
“Abusing the facility, being unfair, deliberately and falsely increasing rank”
and now hurricane147 says I’m discriminating. As well as:
hurricane147 said:
some ppl moan that lower players blah blah
Not forgetting being accused of personal attacks, hmm I wonder why...
hurricane147 said:
you are looking for a way to discriminate, and you already can as you say yourself
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:41 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
continued......
Well thanks for these beautiful accusations guys, what a productive way of debating.
Can’t wait to hear what’s next?
Well I guess this was next…
and i didnt like the idea of myself along with many of my mates, and the many other polite players who are higher ranked being "tarred with the same stick"
again adding to those beautiful comments, “tarred with the same stick”.
I guess this is a new breed of polite and respectful players, right hurricane?
_wrx_ said:
Well thanks for these beautiful accusations guys, what a productive way of debating.
Can’t wait to hear what’s next?
Well I guess this was next…
hurricane147 said:
and i didnt like the idea of myself along with many of my mates, and the many other polite players who are higher ranked being "tarred with the same stick"
again adding to those beautiful comments, “tarred with the same stick”.
I guess this is a new breed of polite and respectful players, right hurricane?
_wrx_ said:
Can’t wait to hear what’s next?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:42 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
I was seeing only one viewpoint being expressed
&
Answer :
Well considering its not me who started this post... if you READ this thread you will notice that funkyjess raised this issue, you will also find others have agreed.
Therefore more then 1,2,3 viewpoints being expressed.
i have read all your posts wrx, very carefully
lol, so why are half of my replies in the form of quotes answering your questions…
hurricane147 said:
I was seeing only one viewpoint being expressed
&
hurricane147 said:
havent you noticed you are the only one asking for this? does that not say something?
Answer :
_wrx_ said:
Well considering its not me who started this post... if you READ this thread you will notice that funkyjess raised this issue, you will also find others have agreed.
Therefore more then 1,2,3 viewpoints being expressed.
hurricane147 said:
i have read all your posts wrx, very carefully
lol, so why are half of my replies in the form of quotes answering your questions…
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:43 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
I guess at the end of the day it is down to Nick and what he sees fit to add to the site, if he thinks this is the best way to help the site grow and increase our in game experience then ultimately he will include it in any future updates that may be coming.
Well since NO ONE has answered/ or cant answer my questions that I have raised on several occasions perhaps Nick can comment..
2good said:
I guess at the end of the day it is down to Nick and what he sees fit to add to the site, if he thinks this is the best way to help the site grow and increase our in game experience then ultimately he will include it in any future updates that may be coming.
Well since NO ONE has answered/ or cant answer my questions that I have raised on several occasions perhaps Nick can comment..
_wrx_ said:
Iv come to a stage where I’m going to be copy and pasting a lot. Since majority of the questions are already answered. Either people haven’t read and jump to conclusions or they can’t read carefully enough. So here we go:
But since its being ignored I’d like you to take a different perspective.
- Why cant small companies participate in the stock Exchange market, amongst blue chip companies?
- Why do boxers have to be in a specific weight class in order to fight?
- Why do we have different divisions in the football league?
_wrx_ said:
But since its being ignored I’d like you to take a different perspective.
- Why cant small companies participate in the stock Exchange market, amongst blue chip companies?
- Why do boxers have to be in a specific weight class in order to fight?
- Why do we have different divisions in the football league?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:43 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
continued...
- How about this one, an example a bit more relevant to this scenario… Why is there a premier league in snooker? http://www.premierleaguesnooker.com/
So now I’m going to be told that these billionaire companies, decades and decades of tradition, rules and regulations, leagues and so on and so forth have been all entirely a waste of time. Damn they must feel gutted.
_wrx_ said:
- How about this one, an example a bit more relevant to this scenario… Why is there a premier league in snooker? http://www.premierleaguesnooker.com/
So now I’m going to be told that these billionaire companies, decades and decades of tradition, rules and regulations, leagues and so on and so forth have been all entirely a waste of time. Damn they must feel gutted.
07:55 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
Please try to keep the quotes and answers chronoligical _wrx_, changing the order of something to change the meaning doesn't do any good when you want to argue your case
Regarding leagues, yes, official leagues and tournaments based on rank have been discussed and will be along in the future.
Untill then, visit the events forum and if you can't find a league that fits your preferences, feel free to run your own based on any criteria you see fit.
So, if there are any other questions unanswered, please let us know
Regarding leagues, yes, official leagues and tournaments based on rank have been discussed and will be along in the future.
Untill then, visit the events forum and if you can't find a league that fits your preferences, feel free to run your own based on any criteria you see fit.
So, if there are any other questions unanswered, please let us know
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
08:27 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
Change the meaning? Perhaps you'd be kind enough to highlight where I have changed the meaning.
I have had to quote from different posts in order to show the readers that some individuals are two faced. People say one thing but do another. I can quote..
Regarding leagues, what you mention is in a complete different context as opposed to what this topic is based upon, try not to get carried away.
If you haven’t noticed up until now we are discussing single games
I have many questions that need answering; please refer to my previous posts on this thread.
You will notice there are dozens to choose from, but have been ignored.
Though I’m not entirely sure I would like answers from people who think its fair to say the following:
I discriminate
I abuse the facility
I am being unfair
I deliberately and falsely increase rank
Some ppl moan
Tarred with the same stick
And then have the guts to say I do a lot of personal attacking… lol this is hilarious.
Edited at 14:30 Thu 31/01/08 (GMT)
I have had to quote from different posts in order to show the readers that some individuals are two faced. People say one thing but do another. I can quote..
Regarding leagues, what you mention is in a complete different context as opposed to what this topic is based upon, try not to get carried away.
If you haven’t noticed up until now we are discussing single games
I have many questions that need answering; please refer to my previous posts on this thread.
You will notice there are dozens to choose from, but have been ignored.
Though I’m not entirely sure I would like answers from people who think its fair to say the following:
I discriminate
I abuse the facility
I am being unfair
I deliberately and falsely increase rank
Some ppl moan
Tarred with the same stick
And then have the guts to say I do a lot of personal attacking… lol this is hilarious.
Edited at 14:30 Thu 31/01/08 (GMT)
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
Ranking Threshold
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.