Clan League Discussion Thread
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:58 Tue 5 Apr 11 (BST) [Link]
I know that 50% of them atm have message they players
00:12 Wed 6 Apr 11 (BST) [Link]
thats settled then, no extension.
whocares8x8 said:
I am neutral on an extension. If people want it (which they dont appear to) I would be fine with allowing clans to play on without the possibility of gaining bonus points for completing a fixture.
Personally, I don't think we need an extension (since defaults won't massively favour one clan as was the case on pool). I also don't think an extension would help punishers vs hawx get games done. The problem is not lazy players who need more time, but players are inactive and there are no subs in this fixture.
Punishers are not the problem. They have clearly shown that they will be able to get games played (look at the cup fixture vs allstarz). Hawx is more difficult, although zac has been known to be able to get a lot of new players in within a short time. I don't think we need to rush about kicking anyone out. It doesn't make a difference whether we do it now or next fixture. Let's give them a chance to get games played next fixture.
So, since quite a lot of people are against extension, I'll say no as well. Bring on the defaults.
Personally, I don't think we need an extension (since defaults won't massively favour one clan as was the case on pool). I also don't think an extension would help punishers vs hawx get games done. The problem is not lazy players who need more time, but players are inactive and there are no subs in this fixture.
Punishers are not the problem. They have clearly shown that they will be able to get games played (look at the cup fixture vs allstarz). Hawx is more difficult, although zac has been known to be able to get a lot of new players in within a short time. I don't think we need to rush about kicking anyone out. It doesn't make a difference whether we do it now or next fixture. Let's give them a chance to get games played next fixture.
So, since quite a lot of people are against extension, I'll say no as well. Bring on the defaults.
thats settled then, no extension.
00:14 Wed 6 Apr 11 (BST) [Link]
thats settled then, no extension.
from an oustiders view seb well put m8 well put
dgeneratio said:
whocares8x8 said:
I am neutral on an extension. If people want it (which they dont appear to) I would be fine with allowing clans to play on without the possibility of gaining bonus points for completing a fixture.
Personally, I don't think we need an extension (since defaults won't massively favour one clan as was the case on pool). I also don't think an extension would help punishers vs hawx get games done. The problem is not lazy players who need more time, but players are inactive and there are no subs in this fixture.
Punishers are not the problem. They have clearly shown that they will be able to get games played (look at the cup fixture vs allstarz). Hawx is more difficult, although zac has been known to be able to get a lot of new players in within a short time. I don't think we need to rush about kicking anyone out. It doesn't make a difference whether we do it now or next fixture. Let's give them a chance to get games played next fixture.
So, since quite a lot of people are against extension, I'll say no as well. Bring on the defaults.
Personally, I don't think we need an extension (since defaults won't massively favour one clan as was the case on pool). I also don't think an extension would help punishers vs hawx get games done. The problem is not lazy players who need more time, but players are inactive and there are no subs in this fixture.
Punishers are not the problem. They have clearly shown that they will be able to get games played (look at the cup fixture vs allstarz). Hawx is more difficult, although zac has been known to be able to get a lot of new players in within a short time. I don't think we need to rush about kicking anyone out. It doesn't make a difference whether we do it now or next fixture. Let's give them a chance to get games played next fixture.
So, since quite a lot of people are against extension, I'll say no as well. Bring on the defaults.
thats settled then, no extension.
from an oustiders view seb well put m8 well put
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
12:50 Wed 6 Apr 11 (BST) [Link]
There was me thinking Punishers had a leader (Me) for the past while, whom without we wouldnt have been even included in the league. Thanks for your vote of confidence Greg.
Further to that I spent a full day arguing our case on the defaults as I felt we were getting hard done by.
I left midway through a fixture that I had not included myself in for any games. No leadership is needed once the games are given out and everybody knows they have to play.
No offence to Zac, I respect the fact you have probably the longest running clan, but most of your players dont even know they are in your clan. They agree and then forget. Other players just close the pm windows when we ask them about the game. And Zac you often log off or disappear during games or when asked to play and then have a wonderful excuse why you had to go! Always!
I messaged my opponent, he never messaged me back despite being online several times since.
----------
Personally I am against the extension, if they games havnt been completed yet, they wont be even after the extension.
The second reason I am against it is, there are rules, it makes a mockery of the whole league if the rules get bent. And it sets a precedent for the future.
Just go to (fair) defaults.
A point on defaults while I am here, there should be (if not already) at least one member of each team on the "panel"
Further to that I spent a full day arguing our case on the defaults as I felt we were getting hard done by.
I left midway through a fixture that I had not included myself in for any games. No leadership is needed once the games are given out and everybody knows they have to play.
No offence to Zac, I respect the fact you have probably the longest running clan, but most of your players dont even know they are in your clan. They agree and then forget. Other players just close the pm windows when we ask them about the game. And Zac you often log off or disappear during games or when asked to play and then have a wonderful excuse why you had to go! Always!
I messaged my opponent, he never messaged me back despite being online several times since.
----------
Personally I am against the extension, if they games havnt been completed yet, they wont be even after the extension.
The second reason I am against it is, there are rules, it makes a mockery of the whole league if the rules get bent. And it sets a precedent for the future.
Just go to (fair) defaults.
A point on defaults while I am here, there should be (if not already) at least one member of each team on the "panel"
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:07 Wed 6 Apr 11 (BST) [Link]
There was 1 person from each team last season?
14:07 Wed 6 Apr 11 (BST) [Link]
nearly i don't think ive had anyone from Hawxs in Defaults Team.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:14 Wed 6 Apr 11 (BST) [Link]
I havent a clue who is on the panel. I didnt think anybody from punishers was on it. I could stand corrected.
I was just making a point that there should if there wasnt already! Hence my use of "(if not already)"
I was just making a point that there should if there wasnt already! Hence my use of "(if not already)"
14:20 Wed 6 Apr 11 (BST) [Link]
3 D&C
1 Globe
2 UT
1 Chaos (well former Chaos)
1 Starz
1 Not involved in snooker clans
was max from Punishers but he left at end of last season.
1 Globe
2 UT
1 Chaos (well former Chaos)
1 Starz
1 Not involved in snooker clans
was max from Punishers but he left at end of last season.
18:45 Wed 6 Apr 11 (BST) [Link]
Edited at 15:55 Wed 06/04/11 (BST)
Edited at 15:55 Wed 06/04/11 (BST)
19:30 Wed 6 Apr 11 (BST) [Link]
shouldnt a fair sweep be 2 members from every clan invloved then
seems that way every1 has an equal voice
seems that way every1 has an equal voice
19:30 Wed 6 Apr 11 (BST) [Link]
well you can use more than one sub, nothing in rules says you cant.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
19:32 Wed 6 Apr 11 (BST) [Link]
@ dgen; dont get stressed by this, bigzuk he obviously does not want either clan to get 10 points in this fixture.
In fact i have seen this guy cry when the server went down a few week ago, he takes things way to serious.
In fact i have seen this guy cry when the server went down a few week ago, he takes things way to serious.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
19:37 Wed 6 Apr 11 (BST) [Link]
You and stop embarrasing yourself.
give dgen some respect he runs the clan league for people like you, no need to call him dumb/stupid
give dgen some respect he runs the clan league for people like you, no need to call him dumb/stupid
19:39 Wed 6 Apr 11 (BST) [Link]
if its me your talking about it has nothing to do with 10 points
its to do with a rule that james satated existed when clearly it didnt then tried to get instated when it was questioned,
also when he realsised he had wrote it on his own thread for all to see he edited it so now its clearly a smiley face
i love this game m8 yes its addictive and also used to be fun to play thats why i became a premium member
its to do with a rule that james satated existed when clearly it didnt then tried to get instated when it was questioned,
also when he realsised he had wrote it on his own thread for all to see he edited it so now its clearly a smiley face
i love this game m8 yes its addictive and also used to be fun to play thats why i became a premium member
19:41 Wed 6 Apr 11 (BST) [Link]
i edited it because i put it in rules myself rather than ask seb tonight.
19:46 Wed 6 Apr 11 (BST) [Link]
respect lol common ill give him respect when he dont treat me like a fool
i questioned a rule that was all he stated it was there
so i asked if he could show me it (it wasnt even there) then he tried to get it added to suit his situation thats all
so were not allowed to question anything is that whats ur implying i should take what james says as law
i questioned a rule that was all he stated it was there
so i asked if he could show me it (it wasnt even there) then he tried to get it added to suit his situation thats all
so were not allowed to question anything is that whats ur implying i should take what james says as law
| Unable to post | |
|---|---|
| Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
Clan League Discussion Thread
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.