Clan League Discussion Thread
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:54 Sat 21 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
I think they mean 2 frames of arc, reg, orig an d carom not just arc.
03:00 Sat 21 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Yes, if both players want it, it will be 2 of each game type, and 1 of power (9 total).
03:00 Sat 21 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Slatty's suggestion about cases where one player deactivates after the game has started. Opinions?
slatty said:
I think games should be able to be abandoned if both clans agree, gives them both hope of bonus points when you get some loser deactivating
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
13:41 Sat 21 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Only thing I would add to this is that it could/should be extended to times where a player has left or been kicked out of a clan rather than just deactivated players.
whocares8x8 said:
Slatty's suggestion about cases where one player deactivates after the game has started. Opinions?
slatty said:
I think games should be able to be abandoned if both clans agree, gives them both hope of bonus points when you get some loser deactivating
Only thing I would add to this is that it could/should be extended to times where a player has left or been kicked out of a clan rather than just deactivated players.
13:50 Sat 21 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
I'm not against this idea- as long as both clans have to agree. Otherwise, you'll get a player leaving at 0-4 down to get a better sub.
14:10 Sat 21 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
true which was a discussion on pool about the same thing, if both clans agree i can't see an issue to implement this
Posted this on pool so i copied here:
regarding the horse/chris discussion snooker is having this same discussion and we may have some up with a solution.
to be able to sub in games already started but not finished BOTH captains has to agree for the sub to take place (points would count), if one captain does not agree then its like the current guidelines and go to default.
mandatory subbing would include a "Ban" or a "Deactivated" user who can no longer reactivate in that scenario you can sub without captains consent. in the games where people "Rage Quit" etc what does not include "Bans" or "Deactivation" then you need captains consent.
thoughts?
Edited at 12:19 Sat 21/01/12 (GMT)
Posted this on pool so i copied here:
regarding the horse/chris discussion snooker is having this same discussion and we may have some up with a solution.
to be able to sub in games already started but not finished BOTH captains has to agree for the sub to take place (points would count), if one captain does not agree then its like the current guidelines and go to default.
mandatory subbing would include a "Ban" or a "Deactivated" user who can no longer reactivate in that scenario you can sub without captains consent. in the games where people "Rage Quit" etc what does not include "Bans" or "Deactivation" then you need captains consent.
thoughts?
Edited at 12:19 Sat 21/01/12 (GMT)
14:25 Sat 21 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
wait wait wait.
The game would be abandoned and started at 0-0 with the new players, right?
Is that what you meant slatty?
The game would be abandoned and started at 0-0 with the new players, right?
Is that what you meant slatty?
14:30 Sat 21 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
ah if that is the case then thats a better solution as it would be fair play.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:30 Sat 21 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
I think thats more open for arguments and problems. If you are only allowed to do this when a player has left a clan for one reason or another it will be more easily managed
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:32 Sat 21 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
yup
whocares8x8 said:
wait wait wait.
The game would be abandoned and started at 0-0 with the new players, right?
Is that what you meant slatty?
The game would be abandoned and started at 0-0 with the new players, right?
Is that what you meant slatty?
yup
14:53 Sat 21 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link] I will never be in favor of any mandatory subbing. Our current system works very well and I think slatty's suggestion would fit in very nicely.
dgeneratio said:
mandatory subbing would include a "Ban" or a "Deactivated" user who can no longer reactivate in that scenario you can sub without captains consent. in the games where people "Rage Quit" etc what does not include "Bans" or "Deactivation" then you need captains consent.
thoughts?
thoughts?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:18 Sat 4 Feb 12 (GMT) [Link]
hey league runners.
did i get it right that the last fixture did get an extra week now as it is very important?
Just read it on allstarz thread where dgen explained it like that! somehow i dont agree with that as it gives the clans playing in last fixture set a better chance to get the bonus points. this is absolutely unfair as clans with a bye in this fixture are disadvantaged by this!
sorry to complain about things the league runners decided but...........
cheers
did i get it right that the last fixture did get an extra week now as it is very important?
Just read it on allstarz thread where dgen explained it like that! somehow i dont agree with that as it gives the clans playing in last fixture set a better chance to get the bonus points. this is absolutely unfair as clans with a bye in this fixture are disadvantaged by this!
sorry to complain about things the league runners decided but...........
cheers
18:22 Sat 4 Feb 12 (GMT) [Link]
yes its right, it also it stops the chance of extension from my view. i think it was decided for this season.
at one time the cup final had no time limit whatsoever which of course didn't work as clans took around 4 weeks to get them played. it got cut down to 2 but because of defaults extension was allowed, this time its almost like a week extension if you like
at one time the cup final had no time limit whatsoever which of course didn't work as clans took around 4 weeks to get them played. it got cut down to 2 but because of defaults extension was allowed, this time its almost like a week extension if you like
18:23 Sat 4 Feb 12 (GMT) [Link]
Doomslave: Good point- with byes it is an advantage for the teams playing.
Two solutions for next season:
1. Only give the Cup/Plate Final a 3-week deadline.
2. Give the league games a 3-week deadline like now, but team can only earn the completion bonus if the games are completed after 14 days.
Two solutions for next season:
1. Only give the Cup/Plate Final a 3-week deadline.
2. Give the league games a 3-week deadline like now, but team can only earn the completion bonus if the games are completed after 14 days.
18:26 Sat 4 Feb 12 (GMT) [Link]
option 1, makes the league shorter i agree the extended deadline should only be for the cup as you don't see league extensions that much but you see cup extensions all the time
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:32 Sat 4 Feb 12 (GMT) [Link]
And what do u wanna tell me with that james?
All fixtures were planned to be played within 2 weeks but not the last?
In my opinion fixture deadlines are deadlines which should not be extended! I really dont agree. On the other hand cup/plate is a totally different story and has nothing to do with the league itself.
All fixtures were planned to be played within 2 weeks but not the last?
In my opinion fixture deadlines are deadlines which should not be extended! I really dont agree. On the other hand cup/plate is a totally different story and has nothing to do with the league itself.
18:36 Sat 4 Feb 12 (GMT) [Link]
The only thing in defense of this season- the byes weren't planned, they were only created when a clan folded early in the season. Will be changed for next season.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:44 Sat 4 Feb 12 (GMT) [Link]
I am sorry seb. but there should not have been an extension for this last fixture, no matter for which reason!
18:47 Sat 4 Feb 12 (GMT) [Link]
ok calm down tiger, mistakes happen, the future is you fix it.
it was made 3 weeks intentionally as it was the most important fixture and we didn't want them decided by defaults but on the tables.
you told us a valid point, were fixing it
it was made 3 weeks intentionally as it was the most important fixture and we didn't want them decided by defaults but on the tables.
you told us a valid point, were fixing it
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
Clan League Discussion Thread
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.