true my first orig max was against a guest but didn't take the importance and the delight after i hit it.

i believe both parties is right and no one is wrong, it just how the individual sees it.

early in my career i would always go for the win as i wasn't good enough to hit 50+ until a year later when i got better i focused on tournaments especially Original with players such as bgyuk, lindsell, cinnamon, arpeggi, chase475 among others. then when Ranked Tournaments came out i focused on Breaks as i didn't like playing Ranked games although some part of me wants to do Original Tournaments again.

Look Wood...

"I will take a 20 break and nudge a red"

In the two power finals where I pulled your pants down... you didnt refuse an easy pot...

So why are you making out you do?

If you were 'capable' of quality positional play and navigating from red to black with ease, your telling me you would just miss as its "fun".

You talk rubbish lad, if you could manage it then you would clean them up.

The only thing you have on me is rank and considering I havent played rank in about a year or even the site regularly in that time either... is the only reason.

You managed a 63% wins in power, mine is 95% so if I win more than surely tells the story that I would out rank you if I tried.

Killer I have 10% on you and even a better rank than you.

Regular its a no contest in my favour as to Arcade. Power I am undefeated against you so indicates the authority there and Carom? Sigh.

So Original - My Half and cent ratio is greatly better and so to my win% is even slightly better. When considering the only times I play Original is against players like Adam, Sean_paul or a 900+ rank... speaks volumes.

So you told me to watch my back? You have played more games than me and achieved less.

I dont want to sound harsh or degrading, im just proving my point.

Thanks - King Derry.

hahahah sometimes I think these threads should get closed but then they are always the most enjoyable ones to read for a neutral!

cue power ,i think your spot on,when you start this game you try to improve yourself and become better,surely the ultimate end product of this is to make a maximum break,its the ultimate improvement,every one of us would like to have one on their stats,and its quite hard to think otherwise,so to say you missed the last, or last but one, colour on purpose because you didnt want one is ridiculous.

First of all Cue Power, you are talking rubbish son. As we have never played in the Power Snooker kiddo. We have played in a Regular Final in which the score was 2-1... TO ME. So first and foremost check your facts.

Please dont talk this rubbish "id out rank you if i tried".. well there it is kid, id OUT BREAK YOU IF I TRIED. But the fact is I do not try. Just because you make more halves per game, more cents per game is meaningless when I would beat you over and over again. Make no mistake. Your stats are simply meaningless. Just check the Regular Final in which i beat you in.

I play to win. I dont play to make big breaks. A Big break is merely a bonus.

The difference is this. As stryderman just said "i mean if im in a game and i pot a red and a black.. straight i think MAXIMUM, and just go for it"... I do not think like this even 1%, its not in my thinking whatsoever.

Giggler. I understand what you are saying, but im afraid I just have a different opinion. I play Tournaments. I rarely play Friendlies. So therefore the only thing I want to do is win the tournament. Breaks are not on my agenda. And I do not need a 147, sure it would be a bonus, but I do not play for one. As for intentionally potting the white instead of the black on the 100... potting the black would be meaningless to me. Recently Ronnie O Sul got 140 and wasnt going to pot the black....he did in the end... I chose not to.

...but if you want to "brag" about an online snooker game, thats up to you.....

capped