The only drug I'm high on is life.

i will happily accept your challenge adam, considering i have hit 356 centuries in arcade, and i have 189 maxes, that makes my ratio at 1.88 i believe, i think i can match ste_efc's record or even beat it for that matter

my priorities are still maxes and cents

and the black never runs safe as long as u can hit it, flukes all the way

Go for it!!! I'll make you the thread if/when you do it.

I was going to say try and get to 500 cents in less games than Destiny, but that's gone haha. Try and do it in less games than Ste though!

The only reason why it has gone, is more than likely due to my poor abandon's because if i join a game and they tap break most of the time i just leave because i dont want to be playing each frame for 20 minutes in all fairness lol, il do 500 cents within ste's games

thats a lie

I never tap break, but then I don't even think about cents! I play the game for fun, and fun alone... I really don't fancy being liked for being good at an online snooker game... I prefer to go on personality...

oh and jack, dance for me.

lmao.

I enter 2 tournaments today because im trying to make up for my rank i lost whilst i was banned.

Your still obsessed with the game.

This whole discussion on this thread is completely pointless... for SO many reasons.
For one it's an internet snooker game. Designed for us to spend time enjoying it, which makes all of these petty arguments seem even worse. Get a grip people. My ratio for hitting maximums accross the board is awful... does that make me a bad player? Nooooo. I can play? Within a frame I can beat anyone. Just like most people on here.... A discussion about who is the "best" is completely stupid... Its all about opinion IMHO. I rate Ste on arcade incredibly high because I've played alot of frames with the guy. Ya'll need your heads banging together...
Peace

except me

i still rate ste as the best arcade player even though hes not as good now, with destiny just behind him (not basing this on stats but from playing them).

now i would say tyler as hes got max consistency as well.

i feel those who have to tap break to do it on arcade isn't the best

ur just upset cos ur rubbish at this game

Upset? Nononono don't get your knickers in a twist. I don't get mad over games, if i did, that would be really sad...

you sound really upset. i can give you a cuddle if you want

lmao

Anyone who can hit a cent or max is a achievement in itself

everyone has different views and goals in life . some are very competitive. some arent . some take funky snooker seriously , some take it as a bit of fun . bit i dont like is when ppl say other peoples views are sad or there wrong . be so boring if everyone had same views and goals .

I've hit a few arcade maxes before but I'm an absolutely dreadful player.

I agree with jack_pot

ste is over rated yes im awful at funky snooker and im not saying im better then him but he his over rated and the fact that is screen he uses is massive, and thats why he's only the best at arcade.

didn't know he uses a big screen? but saying hes best because of a big screen is untrue as damien (arguably the best player ever) got most of his orig maxes on a 15" monitor which is small, and destiny (maybe my pick for best player) got his on a 22" monitor which makes orig like Reg.

and theres Seb, not sure what size his monitor is but i don't think its 22". I've only tried 22" once in college library as i had no work to do and i struggled because of the size difference between my monitor and colleges.

all about personal preference