Snooker Legends 11 vs 12 Assassins

Arcade
scotty2hotti 5 - 1 msl
Regular
borini_2103 vs moore6c
Original
wilson970905 1 vs 4 d_legend TBC
Carom
w_hoolahan 3 - 3 pattie96
Power
garethclin 2 - 4 tombo1
Mixed
allypunk vs clifton188
cphaynes vs diamond_v2
Killer
0 - 0

Allstarz 0 vs 0 Assassins

Arcade
linfield1886 vs alex_lewis
Regular
_nerdzz_ vs spirit_2010
Original
pirate_steve vs clifton188
Carom
adam_147 vs gerard024
Power
dvz vs diamond_v2
Mixed
erigert vs moore6c
turtle1560 vs the_tornado
Killer
0 - 0

Deadline: Sunday 20th April

Message your opponent and arrange to get the games played as soon as you can guys. Cheers, Good Luck!

not quite. He id clearly bit trying to gain an advantage and was leading the frame (no ragequit), so that frame should be replayed.
I know the rules only talk about unintentional disconnections, but i think in this case it would be in the spirit of the game to replay. At the same time, Woody should tell Wilson that this shouldnt happen again!

whocares8x8 m_wood

6.3 Disconnects during games
If a player leaves during a frame (unless due to clearly unintentional connection problems), the frame will be awarded to the opponent (opponent's discretion- the opponent may decide whether to claim the frame, award it to the disconnected player, or replay it). If the disconnected player had effectively won the frame at the time of disconnection (ex. opponent needed snookers), they will be awarded the frame. Clan league runners will only intervene in case of clear unintentional disconnection or to award the frame to the disconnected player.


We are simply going by this rule. He chose to leave the game, if he had lost connection (unintentionally), the frame would be replayed.

But it IS my choice?

I adressed that above. The rule is there to stop people leaving when theyre losing to get a restart. This was clearly not the case here. As your own player said, the guy was in command of the frame. We do want things to be decided on the table as much as possible, so replaying is the only sensible option.
If the rule needs to be made more precise, that can be done as well.

It's a gray area. In this case, for the reasons above, i would ask you to replay the frame, in a similar way to how i can award the frame to a player who was leading.

Original Snooker Friendly - d_legend (4) 16-26 (1) wilson970905 (by default, wilson970905 left the game)


It was hardly a commanding lead. As the rules state, if he had a lead that would have meant snookers from legend, then yeah he would get the frame. But he has chosen to leave the game - in my eyes that's forfeiting it, I certainly wouldn't expect to be given a replay if I left mid game.

Brilliant.. I'll hear a final word from my captain msl.

Didn't see your comment there. I said commanding coz he was on the table.

I know mate haha but alot can still happen with that scoreline. If he was like 50-0 up, he would have more of a "commanding" case haha

I think what is trying to be said is I have the choice, and the suggestion is that i should choose to replay it. But if i can choose to take a win, then I'd be stupid not to take a win. Right?

Going by the rules mate then yeah it is your choice. I dont really see why this is causing such a big deal, rules were made for a reason! haha

Wilson's gonna wake up tomorrow and be like, right, wtf is going on!

msl vs thegame26

arc: msl (63)
reg: thegame26 (93)
orig: msl (51)
carom: msl
power: thegame26 (101)

Through to the next round of the Individual Tourny, along with the_tornado d_legend pattie96 moore6c

Lets hope one of us can go all the way But.... Dont expect me to go easy on you if we meet guys

yessssssss msl

nice one!

yes but you guys dont seem to understand the reason they were made in this case. This rule is there to stop people getting screwed over. Since that is obviously not happening here, i would strongly suggest the frame gets replayed- the most logical and fair thing to do. It doesnt matter whether the lead was commanding. He was at the table when he left. If it was the other way around i would leave the choice completely up to you. But since this was not the case, please replay. Games should be decided on the table.
I am happy to amend the rules if necessary. Remember, they were not written by legal experts to close every loophole and account for every exception.

So you're saying that a player can quit a game at any point, as long as they are at the table and not losing. Right okay haha

If thats the new rule then so be it, we will replay the frame, we are just trying to follow the written rules. Really doesn't make sense to me

I'll replay it mate. I'm alright with that, but what's annoying is soon enough someone like m_wood is going to be in the same scenario as me, and claim the frame for themselves. I think you should change/amend the rule seb. I'm also curious, if I am leading by 28 points, and we are down to colours (the yellow), if i leave, what happens?

turtle 4 - 2 tornado

arcade he was too good breaks of 66 and 60 i was out of sorts..

reg was 1-1 i got 55 break and he got 53 break.

orig was 1-1 aswell he wrapped it up with a 65 break to win it

ggs mate

Unlucky Mark, still a decent 2 points against a very good player